ArticlePediatric quality & safety
A Standardized Approach to Transition Improves Care of Young Adults with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Construction and clinical validation of a Team STEPPS-based discharge planning program for patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Young adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at the risk of poor outcomes when transferring to adult providers. We aimed to increase the percentage of patients with 14-17 years of age undergoing the transition of care and the percentage of patients 18-21 years of age initiating the transfer of care to 50% for 12 months. Our goal was also to improve patient satisfaction with the transfer process. Our balancing measure was not to increase the duration of IBD visits. Methods: We implemented 3 interventions through iterative plan-do-study-act cycles. To understand the impact of the interventions for 12 months, we used statistical process control charts. The duration of IBD visits was used as a balancing measure. We administered an anonymous satisfaction survey through the electronic health record. Results: Total transition discussions increased to a mean of 38% (n = 68). Transition discussions with patients 14-17 years of age increased from baseline, though not consistently. Patients 18-21 years of age initiating transfer of care increased to a mean of 5% (n = 1) following the first intervention and to a mean of 30% (n = 13) following our second and third interventions with special cause variation. There was no significant difference in the duration of IBD visits before and after the intervention period ( Conclusions: We saw improved transition discussions and transfer initiation rates by implementing the first steps of a new process to transition young adults with IBD.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.