ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2025
Prognostic value and immune landscapes of disulfidptosis‑related lncRNAs in bladder cancer.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Disulfidptosis, which was recently identified, has shown promise as a potential cancer treatment. Nonetheless, the precise role of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in this phenomenon is currently unclear. To elucidate their significance in bladder cancer (BLCA), a signature of disulfidptosis-related lncRNAs (DRlncRNAs) was developed and their potential prognostic significance was explored. BLCA sample data were sourced from The Cancer Genome Atlas. A predictive signature comprising DRlncRNAs was formulated and subsequently validated. The combination of this signature with clinical characteristics facilitated the development of a nomogram with practical clinical utility. Additionally, enrichment analysis was conducted, the tumor microenvironment (TME) was assessed, the tumor mutational burden (TMB) was analyzed, and drug sensitivity was explored. Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was utilized to quantify lncRNA expression. The results revealed an eight-gene signature based on DRlncRNAs was established, and the predictive accuracy of the nomogram that incorporated the risk score [area under the curve (AUC)=0.733] outperformed the nomogram without it (AUC=0.703). High-risk groups were associated with pathways such as WNT signaling, focal adhesion and cell cycle pathways. The TME study revealed that high-risk patients had increased immune infiltration, whereas the TMB and tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion scores in low-risk patients indicated a potentially robust immune response. Drug sensitivity analysis identified appropriate antitumor drugs for each group. RT-qPCR experiments validated significant differences in DRlncRNAs expression between normal and BLCA cell lines. In conclusion, the prognostic risk signature, which includes the eight identified DRlncRNAs, demonstrates promise for predicting prognosis of patients with BLCA and guiding the selection of suitable immunotherapy and chemotherapy strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.