ArticleActa Cardiologica Sinica2025
Rhythm Control Better Prevents Stroke than Rate Control in Patients with Concomitant Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide Population Based Cohort Study with Long-Term Follow-Up.
Article in Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Review
- The association of antihistamines and new-onset osteoarthritis in patients with autoimmune disease: a population-based cohort study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the risks of stroke and mortality. It remains unclear whether rhythm control reduces the risk of stroke in patients with AF concomitant with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Methods: We identified AF patients with HCM who were ≥ 18 years old in the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database. Patients using antiarrhythmic medications for ≥ 30 defined daily doses (DDDs) or receiving catheter ablation for AF constituted the rhythm control group. Patients using rate control medications for ≥ 30 DDDs constituted the rate control group. A multivariable Cox regression model was used to evaluate the hazard ratio (HR) for adverse cardiovascular events. Results: We enrolled a total of 178 patients with both AF and HCM without pre-existing cardiovascular diseases. Among them, 99 were in the rhythm control group and 79 were in the rate control group. After a follow-up period of 6.47 ± 0.98 years, the rhythm control group had a lower risk of stroke than the rate control group (adjusted HR: 0.380, p = 0.031) after adjusting for covariates including use of antithrombotic agents. After excluding patients receiving catheter ablation, the rhythm control group still had a lower risk of stroke than the rate control group (adjusted HR: 0.380, p = 0.037). Conclusions: In patients with AF and HCM, rhythm control with mainly pharmacological treatment better prevented stroke than rate control in long-term follow-up. The beneficial effect of lowering stroke risk through rhythm control was independent of oral anticoagulant use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.