ArticleActa Cardiologica Sinica2025
Feasibility and Safety of Distal Radial Artery Access with Recanalization of a Chronic Radial Artery Occlusion for Subsequent Coronary Angiography and Intervention.
Article in Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Distal radial access in interventional cardiology: technique, pitfalls and recommendations.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: This study aims to verify the feasibility and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after a distal transradial approach (dTRA) with radial artery occlusion (RAO) recanalization. Methods: Between July 2018 and January 2022, 30 patients underwent PCI following attempted RAO recanalization via dTRA. Among these cases, the target radial arteries could not be recanalized in five patients, necessitating alternative vascular access. The remaining 25 patients with successful RAO recanalization were divided into a standard group (n = 19) and tough group (n = 6), the latter requiring more than 10 minutes and complex techniques and devices for recanalization. Results: The procedural success rate was 96.7%, with vascular access-site complications occurring in 20% of the cases, including five perforations easily managed with prolonged balloon inflation and one pseudoaneurysm without flow limitation. In the tough group, no significant increase in procedural complications, access-site vascular complications, or total major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events was observed. However, Doppler ultrasound one month later for the recanalized radial artery revealed a significantly higher rate of severe stenosis and re-occlusion at 100% compared to 10% in the standard group, as supported by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Conclusions: The feasibility and safety of PCI following RAO recanalization via dTRA were acceptable. We propose a 10-minute threshold to differentiate between standard and tough groups during RAO recanalization. Given the uncertainty of long-term patency in recanalized RAs, the primary goal in tough cases is to ensure the guide catheter reaches the ascending aorta for subsequent PCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.