ArticleJournal of general and family medicine2025
Development of a Japanese version of the patient perceptions of deprescribing - Short form.
Article in Journal of general and family medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A NASSS framework-guided systematic review and exploratory modelling of digital health interventions for polypharmacy management in older adults.BMC geriatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Association Between Trust in Healthcare Providers and Readiness to Deprescribe in Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study in the United States and Japan.Journal of general and family medicine · 2026Article
- Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire in Japanese.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Article
- Development of a Japanese version of the patient perceptions of deprescribing - Short form.Journal of general and family medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Deprescribing is a critical component of clinical practice, especially in geriatric medicine. Nevertheless, the attributes of patients who are prepared for, interested in, and could potentially benefit from deprescribing have not been well examined. The Patient Perceptions of Deprescribing (PPoD) evaluates patients' overall readiness for deprescribing and is complemented by an 11-item validated short form (SF-PPoD). The objective of this study was to develop a Japanese version of the SF-PPoD and assess its reliability and validity within Japanese older adults with polypharmacy. Methods: The SF-PPoD was translated, back-translated, and assessed in a cognitive interview. We conducted a cross-sectional survey with 196 patients aged 65 years or older with five or more medications using the Japanese version to test for reliability and validity. We examined internal consistency and construct validity to determine if the Japanese sample responses reproduce the two subscales in the original SF-PPoD. Finally, we examined intra-person replicability using the intraclass correlation coefficient, in which 100 participants were invited and 93 participated. Results: 118 males and 78 females, with a mean age of 79.2 [SD 6.5] years, completed the survey. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Japanese version of SF-PPoD revealed satisfactory structural validity with two-dimensional structure, "Motivation for Deprescribing" and "Primary Care Physician Relationship." Cronbach's alpha showed good internal consistency, and test-retest demonstrated acceptable intra-rater reliability. Conclusions: We developed and validated a Japanese version of SF-PPoD with an 11-item, two-dimensional structure consistent with the original SF-PPoD. This scale may facilitate shared decision-making for medication optimization among older adults living with multimorbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.