Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39776870›Full record

ArticleJournal of general and family medicine2025

Japanese family physicians' attitudes, difficulties, and perceived significance in managing mental health problems: A qualitative study.

Natsuki Kajikawa, Shoji Yokoya, Sachiko Ozone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general and family medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Natsuki KajikawaDepartment of Family Medicine, General Practice and Community Health, Faculty of Medicine University of Tsukuba Tsukuba Ibaraki Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7220-7738
Shoji YokoyaDepartment of Family Medicine, General Practice and Community Health, Faculty of Medicine University of Tsukuba Tsukuba Ibaraki Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7430-2787
Sachiko OzoneDepartment of Family Medicine, General Practice and Community Health, Faculty of Medicine University of Tsukuba Tsukuba Ibaraki Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0583-2917

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Family physicians (FPs) are expected to identify, diagnose, and treat mental health problems. Despite challenges such as limited time and low confidence in their skill as mental health providers, FPs generally consider mental health as a meaningful part of their profession. However, the role of the FP in mental health services is not clearly established in Japan. Studies have not been performed in countries without an established role of FPs' in mental health care. This study investigated Japanese FP's attitudes, difficulties, and perceived significance in managing mental health problems. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted between September 2022 and February 2023. Participants were Japanese FPs involved in mental health care. Interview transcripts were subjected to thematic analysis. Results: Thirteen FPs were interviewed. The FPs approached mental health problems "as a FP who provides holistic and comprehensive care" and "practice based on experience and self-reflection." The difficulties faced by FPs included "time management problems" and "referral management problems and conflicts." Regarding significance, FPs mentioned that "gaining a deeper understanding of humanity" is important for managing mental health problems. Conclusions: The attitude of Japanese FPs toward mental health care was based on awareness of the FP's specialty. Despite difficulties such as time and referral management issues, managing mental health problems was generally considered rewarding for professional growth.

Indexed as

family physicianmental healthpsychological problem

Identifiers

PMID39776870
PMCPMC11702421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.