ArticleAddictive behaviors reports2024
"If I could try it, I'd try it": Qualitative study of the illegal vaping culture in Singapore.
Article in Addictive behaviors reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterizing Online Opinion on Vaping and E-Cigarettes in X (Formerly Twitter) Discourse in Singapore: Infodemiology Study.JMIR infodemiology · 2026Article
- Harm Perception of Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Versus Regular Cigarettes in Singapore: Findings from a Nationwide Study.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2026Article
- Attractiveness and determinants of different tobacco products among Chinese smokers and non-smokers: a web-based cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims and background: Singapore has one the world's strictest e-cigarette (vaping) regulations, with bans on e-cigarette import, sale, purchase, use and possession. Nevertheless, Singapore is seeing a growing vaping trend. Beyond estimates of vaping prevalence, little is known about vaping in countries where it is banned or the features and drivers of such illegal vaping cultures. This qualitative study thus explored the characteristics of Singapore's illegal vaping culture. Methods: We held ten focus group discussions with 63 Singaporeans aged 21-40 years, exploring participants' experiences and views related to vaping in Singapore. Transcripts of the discussions were coded using deductive and inductive coding methods. Results: Despite its illegal status, vaping was perceived as appealing due to the novelty flavours, ease of use, and convenient access. Harm perceptions were mixed, with concerns over the adverse health impacts along with beliefs that vaping was innocuous when used in moderation. A conspicuous vaping culture among young people, along with perceptions of lax enforcement, drove beliefs that vaping is an entrenched social norm in Singapore. This belief was in turn associated with a sentiment that Singapore should introduce a regulated e-cigarette market to better control its use among the general population. Conclusions: The reinforcement of vaping as a social norm appears to be driving an illegal vaping culture in Singapore. Measures that denormalise vaping could help to strengthen the effectiveness of the vaping ban.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.