ArticleJournal of pain research2025
The Investigation of the Relationship Between Individual Pain Perception, Brain Electrical Activity, and Facial Expression Based on Combined EEG and Facial EMG Analysis.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Signal Stacking to Dynamic Coupling: A Critical Review of Wearable EEG-EMG Fusion Brain-Computer Interfaces for Stroke Rehabilitation.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Advances in Remote Monitoring Technology Applications in Anesthesia: A Narrative Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Review
- TransTCNet: Transformer-Based Temporal-Contextual Network for Low-Latency Typing Interfaces on Edge Devices.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Pain is a multidimensional, unpleasant emotional and sensory experience, and accurately assessing its intensity is crucial for effective management. However, individuals with cognitive impairments or language deficits may struggle to accurately report their pain. EEG provides insight into the neurological aspects of pain, while facial EMG captures the sensory and peripheral muscle responses. Our objective is to explore the relationship between individual pain perception, brain activity, and facial expressions through a combined analysis of EEG and facial EMG, aiming to provide an objective and multidimensional approach to pain assessment. Methods: We investigated pain perception in response to electrical stimulation of the middle finger in 26 healthy subjects. The 32-channel EEG and 3-channel facial EMG signals were simultaneously recorded during a pain rating task. Group difference and correlation analysis were employed to investigate the relationship between individual pain perception, EEG, and facial EMG. The general linear model (GLM) was used for multidimensional pain assessment. Results: The EEG analysis revealed that painful stimuli induced N2-P2 complex waveforms and gamma oscillations, with substantial variability in response to different stimuli. The facial EMG signals also demonstrated significant differences and variability correlated with subjective pain ratings. A combined analysis of EEG and facial EMG data using a general linear model indicated that both N2-P2 complex waveforms and the zygomatic muscle responses significantly contributed to pain assessment. Conclusion: Facial EMG signals provide pain descriptions which are not sufficiently captured by EEG signals, and integrating both signals offers a more comprehensive understanding of pain perception. Our study underscores the potential of multimodal neurophysiological measurements in pain perception, offering a more comprehensive framework for evaluating pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.