ArticleOTO open
Investigation of Third Window Symptoms in Patients With Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct: A Pilot Study.
Article in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess if patients with enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) experience symptoms characteristic of other third mobile window disorders such as superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS). Study design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Tertiary care center. Methods: Adult and pediatric patients with EVA were screened. Patients with additional middle or inner ear pathology were excluded. The included patients and parents of pediatric patients were asked to complete a survey regarding symptoms, including autophony, hyperacusis, and sound- and pressure induced dizziness. Results: Of the 121 patients who met inclusion criteria, 36 patients and parents completed the questionnaire (15 children and 21 adults). Adult EVA patients appeared to suffer from similar rates of hyperacusis (67%), autophony (52%), pressure induced dizziness (38%), ear fullness (62%), and spontaneous dizziness or vertigo (67%) compared to reported rates among SCDS patients. Children with EVA also appeared to have similar rates of hyperacusis (67%), ear fullness (47%), and spontaneous dizziness or vertigo (40%), while pressure induced dizziness (13%) and autophony (20%) seem less common in children and sound induced dizziness appears less common in both children and adults (13% and 14% respectively). Conclusion: This is the first study investigating the prevalence of typical third-window symptoms in patients with EVA. We found an overlap in the prevalence of several specific and nonspecific third window symptoms for patients with EVA and SCDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.