ArticleInfection and drug resistance2025
Deep Learning for Discrimination of Early Spinal Tuberculosis from Acute Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture on CT.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of the Efficacy and Prognosis of Different Treatment Strategies for Spinal Tuberculosis Patients Undergoing Vertebral Augmentation Surgery by Mistake.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
- Convolutional neural network analysis of cervical CT images: classification of Kikuchi disease, lymphoma, lymphadenitis, and tuberculosis.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Article
- Deep learning segmentation with uncertainty quantification for spinal tuberculosis on fat-suppressed T2-weighted MRI.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Deep learning model for differentiating acute and chronic osteoporotic vertebral compressive fractures on multidetector CT: a retrospective study with external validation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Computer-aided detection of equivocal spinal tuberculosis on X-ray using a YOLOv11-based deep learning model.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Multiscale interface engineering in biohybrid composites for biomedical applications.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Deep Learning-Based Differentiation of Vertebral Body Lesions on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early differentiation between spinal tuberculosis (STB) and acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) is crucial for determining the appropriate clinical management and treatment pathway, thereby significantly impacting patient outcomes. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of deep learning (DL) models using reconstructed sagittal CT images in the differentiation of early STB from acute OVCF, with the aim of enhancing diagnostic precision, reducing reliance on MRI and biopsies, and minimizing the risks of misdiagnosis. Methods: Data were collected from 373 patients, with 302 patients recruited from a university-affiliated hospital serving as the training and internal validation sets, and an additional 71 patients from another university-affiliated hospital serving as the external validation set. MVITV2, Efficient-Net-B5, ResNet101, and ResNet50 were used as the backbone networks for DL model development, training, and validation. Model evaluation was based on accuracy, precision, sensitivity, F1 score, and area under the curve (AUC). The performance of the DL models was compared with the diagnostic accuracy of two spine surgeons who performed a blinded review. Results: The MVITV2 model outperformed other architectures in the internal validation set, achieving accuracy of 98.98%, precision of 100%, sensitivity of 97.97%, F1 score of 98.98%, and AUC of 0.997. The performance of the DL models notably exceeded that of the spine surgeons, who achieved accuracy rates of 77.38% and 93.56%. The external validation confirmed the models' robustness and generalizability. Conclusion: The DL models significantly improved the differentiation between STB and OVCF, surpassing experienced spine surgeons in diagnostic accuracy. These models offer a promising alternative to traditional imaging and invasive procedures, potentially promoting early and accurate diagnosis, reducing healthcare costs, and improving patient outcomes. The findings underscore the potential of artificial intelligence for revolutionizing spinal disease diagnostics, and have substantial clinical implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.