Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39776757›Full record

ArticleInfection and drug resistance2025

Deep Learning for Discrimination of Early Spinal Tuberculosis from Acute Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture on CT.

Wenjun Liu, Jin Wang, Yiting Lei, Peng Liu, Zhenghan Han, Shichu Wang, Bo Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wenjun LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Jin WangCollege of Medical Informatics, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Yiting LeiDepartment of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Peng LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Zhenghan HanDepartment of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Shichu WangDepartment of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Bo LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0005-6182-8172

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early differentiation between spinal tuberculosis (STB) and acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) is crucial for determining the appropriate clinical management and treatment pathway, thereby significantly impacting patient outcomes. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of deep learning (DL) models using reconstructed sagittal CT images in the differentiation of early STB from acute OVCF, with the aim of enhancing diagnostic precision, reducing reliance on MRI and biopsies, and minimizing the risks of misdiagnosis. Methods: Data were collected from 373 patients, with 302 patients recruited from a university-affiliated hospital serving as the training and internal validation sets, and an additional 71 patients from another university-affiliated hospital serving as the external validation set. MVITV2, Efficient-Net-B5, ResNet101, and ResNet50 were used as the backbone networks for DL model development, training, and validation. Model evaluation was based on accuracy, precision, sensitivity, F1 score, and area under the curve (AUC). The performance of the DL models was compared with the diagnostic accuracy of two spine surgeons who performed a blinded review. Results: The MVITV2 model outperformed other architectures in the internal validation set, achieving accuracy of 98.98%, precision of 100%, sensitivity of 97.97%, F1 score of 98.98%, and AUC of 0.997. The performance of the DL models notably exceeded that of the spine surgeons, who achieved accuracy rates of 77.38% and 93.56%. The external validation confirmed the models' robustness and generalizability. Conclusion: The DL models significantly improved the differentiation between STB and OVCF, surpassing experienced spine surgeons in diagnostic accuracy. These models offer a promising alternative to traditional imaging and invasive procedures, potentially promoting early and accurate diagnosis, reducing healthcare costs, and improving patient outcomes. The findings underscore the potential of artificial intelligence for revolutionizing spinal disease diagnostics, and have substantial clinical implications.

Indexed as

CT imagingdeep learningdiagnostic accuracyosteoporotic vertebral fracturesspinal tuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID39776757
PMCPMC11706012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.