ArticleCureus2024
Aortic Unicuspid Valve Surgery in a Young Patient: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The patient was a 33-year-old male. He was noted to have a systolic murmur in the aortic valve region during childhood and underwent balloon valvuloplasty at a pediatric clinic. However, he was not followed up thereafter. Recently, he began experiencing exertional dyspnea and presented to our cardiology department. Detailed examinations, including echocardiography, revealed moderate aortic regurgitation and stenosis, and a unicuspid aortic valve was suspected morphologically. After discussing the findings with the patient, he opted for surgical treatment. The operation was performed under general anesthesia via a median sternotomy. Intraoperative inspection of the aortic valve confirmed a unicuspid morphology, consistent with the preoperative findings. The unicuspid valve was excised and replaced with a mechanical valve (St. Jude Medical (SJM) 25 mm). The surgery was completed without complications, and the postoperative course was uneventful. The patient was discharged home on postoperative day 10. Five years postoperatively, the patient remains asymptomatic and in good condition. Given the rarity of unicuspid aortic valve cases, this report is of significant clinical value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.