ArticleCureus2024
The Impact of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy on Swallowing Function and Aspiration in Patients and Healthy Adults: A Scoping Review.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- High-Flow Nasal Oxygen in Contemporary Airway Management: Enhancing Physiological Safety in Anaesthesia-A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNO) is highly versatile and employed in varied situations, including after extubation, in cases of respiratory failure, and at the end of life. However, its impact on swallowing function is not yet elucidated. Therefore, this scoping review aimed to clarify how HFNO affects swallowing function and whether it poses a risk for aspiration pneumonia. We searched the databases MEDLINE via PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from inception till June 5, 2024, to gather relevant studies. No language restrictions were applied. The eligibility criteria were as follows: (1) studies involving adults using HFNO, (2) studies examining swallowing function and the occurrence of pneumonia, and (3) excluding gray literature such as conference proceedings. A total of 1449 articles were initially identified, of which 12 that met the inclusion criteria were included in the final analysis. Of them, five involved healthy adults, whereas seven involved patients. Six studies investigated the effects of flow rate on the swallowing function, five studies on healthy adults, and one on patients. The review findings indicated that as the flow rate increased, the swallowing function was affected by the shortening of the latency time of the swallowing response and laryngeal vestibular closure time. Additionally, the increase in the flow rate caused modulation of the swallowing-breathing coordination. However, none of the studies reported that HFNO increases the incidence of pneumonia. The increased flow rates of HFNO affect the swallowing function; however, the actual impact on patients is currently unknown. This study involved a small number of healthy adults; therefore, further research based on the patient characteristics is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.