ReviewCureus2024
Continuous Catheter Versus Single-Shot Interscalene Block in Shoulder Surgery: A Review and Recommendations for Postoperative Pain Management.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Two paths, one goal-uniting regional and general anesthesia for optimal surgical care: a narrative review.Ewha medical journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Shoulder arthroscopic and arthroplastic surgeries are associated with significant postoperative pain, which can delay recovery and increase opioid consumption. Interscalene blocks (ISBs) are a commonly used method to manage this pain, either as single-shot injections or continuous catheter infusions (CISBs). This review synthesizes findings from studies conducted in the past five years, comparing the efficacy, complications, and outcomes of single-shot ISBs versus CISBs for postoperative pain management in shoulder surgeries. Current literature highlights key differences: single-shot ISBs provide significant immediate postoperative pain relief, whereas CISBs offer prolonged analgesia beyond 48 hours, reduced opioid consumption, and enhanced recovery outcomes. However, CISBs carry a higher risk of complications and procedural complexity compared to single-shot ISBs. Both single-shot ISBs and CISBs present effective options for postoperative pain control in shoulder surgery patients. Single-shot ISBs may be preferable for patients seeking immediate pain relief with fewer complications, while CISBs are beneficial for those requiring prolonged analgesia. The choice of technique should be individualized based on the patient's needs, expected recovery, and potential risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.