Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39776714›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Continuous Catheter Versus Single-Shot Interscalene Block in Shoulder Surgery: A Review and Recommendations for Postoperative Pain Management.

Thomas L Karadimas, Kalie L Nuss, Ryan D Bridgeport, Morgan James, Panteli Hapipis, Austin Buchanan, James Champane

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas L KaradimasMedicine, Morsani College of Medicine, USF Health, Tampa, USA.
Kalie L NussMedicine, Morsani College of Medicine, USF Health, Tampa, USA.
Ryan D BridgeportMedicine, Morsani College of Medicine, USF Health, Tampa, USA.
Morgan JamesNatural Science, College of Natural Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.
Panteli HapipisNatural Science, College of Natural Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.
Austin BuchananMedicine, Morsani College of Medicine, USF Health, Tampa, USA.
James ChampaneEmergency Medicine, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shoulder arthroscopic and arthroplastic surgeries are associated with significant postoperative pain, which can delay recovery and increase opioid consumption. Interscalene blocks (ISBs) are a commonly used method to manage this pain, either as single-shot injections or continuous catheter infusions (CISBs). This review synthesizes findings from studies conducted in the past five years, comparing the efficacy, complications, and outcomes of single-shot ISBs versus CISBs for postoperative pain management in shoulder surgeries. Current literature highlights key differences: single-shot ISBs provide significant immediate postoperative pain relief, whereas CISBs offer prolonged analgesia beyond 48 hours, reduced opioid consumption, and enhanced recovery outcomes. However, CISBs carry a higher risk of complications and procedural complexity compared to single-shot ISBs. Both single-shot ISBs and CISBs present effective options for postoperative pain control in shoulder surgery patients. Single-shot ISBs may be preferable for patients seeking immediate pain relief with fewer complications, while CISBs are beneficial for those requiring prolonged analgesia. The choice of technique should be individualized based on the patient's needs, expected recovery, and potential risk factors.

Indexed as

continuous interscalene blockopioid reductionpain managementshoulder surgerysingle-shot interscalene block

Identifiers

PMID39776714
PMCPMC11706446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.