ArticleJournal of veterinary research2024
The influence of probiotic administration on selected leukocyte subpopulations and the serum amyloid A concentration in the peripheral blood of dairy cows during different lactation periods.
Article in Journal of veterinary research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of the study was to compare selected leukocyte subpopulations and the serum amyloid A (SAA) concentration in the peripheral blood of cows at different stages of lactation. The blood of cows receiving a probiotic as a dietary supplement was compared with the blood of cows not receiving it. Material and Methods: The research was conducted on 20 pregnant dairy cows randomly divided into two groups of 10 cows each. The experimental group consisted of cows given the probiotic as a feed supplement. The control group consisted of cows that were fed without supplementation. Blood was drawn six times for testing: 7 days before drying; 14 days before parturition; and 7, 21, 60 and 90 days postpartum. Leukocyte immunophenotyping was performed by flow cytometry. Results: The blood of cows administered the probiotic revealed an increased percentage of forkhead box protein 3 (Foxp3) Conclusion: The activity of the immune system in cows receiving the probiotic was higher than in control cows. However, the stabilisation of the immune system of the supplemented cows may be indicated by the persistence of a low level of SAA throughout the experiment. Therefore, it can be assumed that the immune system of cows treated with the probiotic more easily adapts to changes in conditions in particular lactation periods and that these cows become more resistant to infectious diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.