ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2025
Predicting the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) emergence in 5 years using mammography images: a comparison study between radiomics and deep learning algorithm.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been steadily increasing over the years. We aim to predict the occurrence of T2DM using mammography images within 5 years using two different methods and compare their performance. Approach: We examined 312 samples, including 110 positive cases (developed T2DM after 5 years) and 202 negative cases (did not develop T2DM) using two different methods. In the first method, a radiomics-based approach, we utilized radiomics features and machine learning (ML) algorithms. The entire breast region was chosen as the region of interest for extracting radiomics features. Then, a binary breast image was created from which we extracted 668 features and analyzed them using various ML algorithms. In the second method, a complex convolutional neural network (CNN) with a modified ResNet architecture and various kernel sizes was applied to raw mammography images for the prediction task. A nested, stratified five-fold cross-validation was done for both parts A and B to compute accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC). Hyperparameter tuning was also done to enhance the model's performance and reliability. Results: The radiomics approach's light gradient boosting model gave 68.9% accuracy, 30.7% sensitivity, 89.5% specificity, and 0.63 AUROC. The CNN method achieved an AUROC of 0.58 over 20 epochs. Conclusion: Radiomics outperformed CNN by 0.05 in terms of AUROC. This may be due to the more straightforward interpretability and clinical relevance of predefined radiomics features compared with the complex, abstract features learned by CNNs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.