Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39776665›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2025

Predicting the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) emergence in 5 years using mammography images: a comparison study between radiomics and deep learning algorithm.

Nishta Letchumanan, Shouhei Hanaoka, Tomomi Takenaga, Yusuke Suzuki, Takahiro Nakao, Yukihiro Nomura, Takeharu Yoshikawa, Osamu Abe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nishta LetchumananThe University of Tokyo, Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6363-0305
Shouhei HanaokaThe University of Tokyo Hospital, Department of Radiology, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7496-1651
Tomomi TakenagaThe University of Tokyo Hospital, Department of Radiology, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7198-1588
Yusuke SuzukiThe University of Tokyo Hospital, Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiro NakaoThe University of Tokyo Hospital, Department of Computational Diagnostic Radiology and Preventive Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9498-7501
Yukihiro NomuraThe University of Tokyo Hospital, Department of Computational Diagnostic Radiology and Preventive Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6471-9936
Takeharu YoshikawaThe University of Tokyo Hospital, Department of Computational Diagnostic Radiology and Preventive Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1924-5468
Osamu AbeThe University of Tokyo Hospital, Department of Radiology, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1180-2629

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been steadily increasing over the years. We aim to predict the occurrence of T2DM using mammography images within 5 years using two different methods and compare their performance. Approach: We examined 312 samples, including 110 positive cases (developed T2DM after 5 years) and 202 negative cases (did not develop T2DM) using two different methods. In the first method, a radiomics-based approach, we utilized radiomics features and machine learning (ML) algorithms. The entire breast region was chosen as the region of interest for extracting radiomics features. Then, a binary breast image was created from which we extracted 668 features and analyzed them using various ML algorithms. In the second method, a complex convolutional neural network (CNN) with a modified ResNet architecture and various kernel sizes was applied to raw mammography images for the prediction task. A nested, stratified five-fold cross-validation was done for both parts A and B to compute accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC). Hyperparameter tuning was also done to enhance the model's performance and reliability. Results: The radiomics approach's light gradient boosting model gave 68.9% accuracy, 30.7% sensitivity, 89.5% specificity, and 0.63 AUROC. The CNN method achieved an AUROC of 0.58 over 20 epochs. Conclusion: Radiomics outperformed CNN by 0.05 in terms of AUROC. This may be due to the more straightforward interpretability and clinical relevance of predefined radiomics features compared with the complex, abstract features learned by CNNs.

Indexed as

convolutional neural networkdeep learningmachine learningmammographyradiomicstype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID39776665
PMCPMC11702674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.