ArticleJAMIA open2025
Assessing Artificial Intelligence (AI) Implementation for Assisting Gene Linking (at the National Library of Medicine).
Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated indexing in MEDLINE and the Medical Text Indexer (MTI), 2000-2025: a scoping review.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2026Article
- AI in biocuration: challenges, opportunities, and a roadmap for sustainable integration.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Empowering biological knowledgebases: advances in human-in-the-loop AI-driven literature curation.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Review
- A standards perspective on genomic data reusability and reproducibility.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The National Library of Medicine (NLM) currently indexes close to a million articles each year pertaining to more than 5300 medicine and life sciences journals. Of these, a significant number of articles contain critical information about the structure, genetics, and function of genes and proteins in normal and disease states. These articles are identified by the NLM curators, and a manual link is created between these articles and the corresponding gene records at the NCBI Gene database. Thus, the information is interconnected with all the NLM resources, services which bring considerable value to life sciences. National Library of Medicine aims to provide timely access to all metadata, and this necessitates that the article indexing scales to the volume of the published literature. On the other hand, although automatic information extraction methods have been shown to achieve accurate results in biomedical text mining research, it remains difficult to evaluate them on established pipelines and integrate them within the daily workflows. Materials and Methods: Here, we demonstrate how our machine learning model, GNorm2, which achieved state-of-the art performance on identifying genes and their corresponding species at the same time handling innate textual ambiguities, could be integrated with the established daily workflow at the NLM and evaluated for its performance in this new environment. Results: We worked with 8 biomedical curator experts and evaluated the integration using these parameters: (1) gene identification accuracy, (2) interannotator agreement with and without GNorm2, (3) GNorm2 potential bias, and (4) indexing consistency and efficiency. We identified key interface changes that significantly helped the curators to maximize the GNorm2 benefit, and further improved the GNorm2 algorithm to cover 135 species of genes including viral and bacterial genes, based on the biocurator expert survey. Conclusion: GNorm2 is currently in the process of being fully integrated into the regular curator's workflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.