ArticleBiological imaging2024
Deep-blur: Blind identification and deblurring with convolutional neural networks.
Article in Biological imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We propose a neural network architecture and a training procedure to estimate blurring operators and deblur images from a single degraded image. Our key assumption is that the forward operators can be parameterized by a low-dimensional vector. The models we consider include a description of the point spread function with Zernike polynomials in the pupil plane or product-convolution expansions, which incorporate space-varying operators. Numerical experiments show that the proposed method can accurately and robustly recover the blur parameters even for large noise levels. For a convolution model, the average signal-to-noise ratio of the recovered point spread function ranges from 13 dB in the noiseless regime to 8 dB in the high-noise regime. In comparison, the tested alternatives yield negative values. This operator estimate can then be used as an input for an unrolled neural network to deblur the image. Quantitative experiments on synthetic data demonstrate that this method outperforms other commonly used methods both perceptually and in terms of SSIM. The algorithm can process a 512 512 image under a second on a consumer graphics card and does not require any human interaction once the operator parameterization has been set up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.