Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39776609›Full record

ReviewBiological imaging2024

Deep-learning-based image compression for microscopy images: An empirical study.

Yu Zhou, Jan Sollmann, Jianxu Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yu ZhouDepartment of Biospectroscopy, Leibniz-Institut für Analytische Wissenschaften - ISAS - e.V., Dortmund, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3914-1102
Jan SollmannDepartment of Biospectroscopy, Leibniz-Institut für Analytische Wissenschaften - ISAS - e.V., Dortmund, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3973-4641
Jianxu ChenDepartment of Biospectroscopy, Leibniz-Institut für Analytische Wissenschaften - ISAS - e.V., Dortmund, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8500-1357

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the fast development of modern microscopes and bioimaging techniques, an unprecedentedly large amount of imaging data is being generated, stored, analyzed, and shared through networks. The size of the data poses great challenges for current data infrastructure. One common way to reduce the data size is by image compression. This study analyzes multiple classic and deep-learning-based image compression methods, as well as an empirical study on their impact on downstream deep-learning-based image processing models. We used deep-learning-based label-free prediction models (i.e., predicting fluorescent images from bright-field images) as an example downstream task for the comparison and analysis of the impact of image compression. Different compression techniques are compared in compression ratio, image similarity, and, most importantly, the prediction accuracy of label-free models on original and compressed images. We found that artificial intelligence (AI)-based compression techniques largely outperform the classic ones with minimal influence on the downstream 2D label-free tasks. In the end, we hope this study could shed light on the potential of deep-learning-based image compression and raise the awareness of the potential impacts of image compression on downstream deep-learning models for analysis.

Indexed as

compressiondeep learningin-silico labellingmicroscopic images

Identifiers

PMID39776609
PMCPMC11704128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.