ReviewBiological imaging2024
Deep-learning-based image compression for microscopy images: An empirical study.
Review in Biological imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Progress and new challenges in image-based profiling.Molecular systems biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the fast development of modern microscopes and bioimaging techniques, an unprecedentedly large amount of imaging data is being generated, stored, analyzed, and shared through networks. The size of the data poses great challenges for current data infrastructure. One common way to reduce the data size is by image compression. This study analyzes multiple classic and deep-learning-based image compression methods, as well as an empirical study on their impact on downstream deep-learning-based image processing models. We used deep-learning-based label-free prediction models (i.e., predicting fluorescent images from bright-field images) as an example downstream task for the comparison and analysis of the impact of image compression. Different compression techniques are compared in compression ratio, image similarity, and, most importantly, the prediction accuracy of label-free models on original and compressed images. We found that artificial intelligence (AI)-based compression techniques largely outperform the classic ones with minimal influence on the downstream 2D label-free tasks. In the end, we hope this study could shed light on the potential of deep-learning-based image compression and raise the awareness of the potential impacts of image compression on downstream deep-learning models for analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.