ArticleArab journal of urology2025
Comparing surgical techniques: ThuLEP and transurethral BPEP for prostate over 80 grams. Intraoperative and postoperative results. A prospective randomized trial.
Article in Arab journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate vs bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate in moderate-to-large prostates: perioperative and functional outcomes.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2026Article
- Thulium YAG laser versus bipolar enucleation for management of benign prostate obstruction secondary to large prostates (>80 gm): A multicenter prospective randomized study.Arab journal of urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Though TURP remains the primary treatment for BPH, advancements in energy and technology have introduced innovative transurethral surgical options. In this study, we assessed and compared the effectiveness and safety of using thulium laser and bipolar for endoscopic enucleation of prostate exceeding 80 g. Patients and methods: Between January 2022 and July 2023, this study enrolled patients with LUTS due to BPH and a prostate size of ≥80 g. Group A underwent the BPEP procedure using a 26 Fr continuous flow resectoscope with plasma kinetic system enucleation loops, while Group B underwent the ThuLEP procedure using a 120-200 W Revolix DUO® Thulium laser. Data collection included prostate size, PSA levels, enucleation and morcellation time, and postoperative IPSS and IIEF-5 scores at one, 3, 6, and 12 months. Results: A total of 108 patients, divided into Group A (BPEP) and Group B (ThuLEP), completed a 12-month follow-up. The mean age for group A was 67.72 ± 7.02 compared to group B which was 62.33 ± 5.86. While Group A compared to group B had higher mean enucleation (75.22 ± 10.55 vs. 67 ± 12.18) and total operative times (117.22 ± 17.76 vs.90.5 ± 18.29) ( Conclusion: ThuLEP shows better perioperative parameters in comparison to BPEP. Nevertheless, there are no notable differences in functional results and complications between the two techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.