Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39776525›Full record

ReviewNeuro-oncology practice2025

Financial challenges of being on long-term, high-cost medications.

Cleopatra Elshiekh, Roberta Rudà, Edward R Scheffer Cliff, Francesca Gany, Joshua A Budhu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuro-oncology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Health disparities in neurology.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cleopatra ElshiekhImmigrant Health and Cancer Disparities Service, Department of Psychiatry, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Roberta RudàDivision of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9134-1537
Edward R Scheffer CliffProgram On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5977-907X
Francesca GanyImmigrant Health and Cancer Disparities Service, Department of Psychiatry, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0684-2367
Joshua A BudhuDepartment of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8923-9784

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Training and Career Development CoreU54CA132378 · NCI · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI Bao Q Vuong · 2008 to 2026
$28.9M
Training and Career Development and Education CoreU54CA137788 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI ADRIANA ESPINOSA, FRANCESCA M GANY · 2008 to 2026
$28.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS U54 CA132378NCI NIH HHS U54 CA137788
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) inhibitor, vorasidenib, may offer a promising new treatment option for patients with IDH-mutant gliomas. However, the indefinite nature of this targeted therapy raises significant financial concerns. High costs of targeted cancer therapies, often exceeding $150 000 annually, contribute to financial toxicity, characterized by medical debt, income loss, and psychological stress, and place stress on health systems. This review analyzes the drug approval and pricing mechanisms in various countries and their impact on healthcare costs and patient access, focusing specifically on the impacts in neuro-oncology. The United States employs a market-driven approach resulting in higher drug prices, while most countries, such as the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy, Japan, South Africa, and Brazil, use negotiated pricing and health technology assessment to manage costs. The financial burden of expensive medications affects patient adherence and quality of life, with many cancer patients facing substantial out-of-pocket expenses and potential treatment abandonment, and many more unable to access these drugs altogether. Vorasidenib's introduction, while potentially improving patient outcomes, may exacerbate financial toxicity unless mitigated by patient access programs and cost-management strategies. As neuro-oncology treatment paradigms evolve, understanding the economic implications of new therapies is essential to ensure equitable access and optimize patient care.

Indexed as

cost-effectiveness analysisdrug pricingfinancial toxicityhealth equitysocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID39776525
PMCPMC11703369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.