ReviewNeuro-oncology practice2025
Financial challenges of being on long-term, high-cost medications.
Review in Neuro-oncology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy, Quality of Life, and Cost-Effectiveness of Superselective Adrenal Arterial Embolization in Idiopathic Hyperaldosteronism: A Comparative Study.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Trial
- Patient navigation in neuro-oncology: A scoping review of programs supporting patients with CNS tumors.Equity neuroscience · 2026Article
- Equity in Neurotoxicity Care in the Era of Cancer Immunotherapy.Seminars in neurology · 2026Article
- Socioeconomic disparities in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma survival: interactions between age and household income in a SEER cohort.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Understanding financial toxicity in cancer care through a social-ecological lens.Current opinion in oncology · 2026Review
- The Impact of Sociodemographic Disparities on Health-Related Quality of Life for Adults with Gliomas.Cancers · 2026Review
- Construction and internal assessment of an exploratory risk prediction model for psychological distress in brain tumor patients: a cross-sectional study.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Bioethical challenges in the implementation of targeted anti-tumor therapies in low-resource settings: a perspective from Latin America.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2026Review
- Screened but Still Struggling: Challenges in Delivering Financial Assistance After Positive Financial Toxicity Screens.JCO oncology practice · 2025Article
- Health disparities in neurology.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2025Review
- International price comparisons for national price-negotiated drugs in China: a cross-regional analysis.Health policy and planning · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) inhibitor, vorasidenib, may offer a promising new treatment option for patients with IDH-mutant gliomas. However, the indefinite nature of this targeted therapy raises significant financial concerns. High costs of targeted cancer therapies, often exceeding $150 000 annually, contribute to financial toxicity, characterized by medical debt, income loss, and psychological stress, and place stress on health systems. This review analyzes the drug approval and pricing mechanisms in various countries and their impact on healthcare costs and patient access, focusing specifically on the impacts in neuro-oncology. The United States employs a market-driven approach resulting in higher drug prices, while most countries, such as the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy, Japan, South Africa, and Brazil, use negotiated pricing and health technology assessment to manage costs. The financial burden of expensive medications affects patient adherence and quality of life, with many cancer patients facing substantial out-of-pocket expenses and potential treatment abandonment, and many more unable to access these drugs altogether. Vorasidenib's introduction, while potentially improving patient outcomes, may exacerbate financial toxicity unless mitigated by patient access programs and cost-management strategies. As neuro-oncology treatment paradigms evolve, understanding the economic implications of new therapies is essential to ensure equitable access and optimize patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.