Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39776494›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2024

Hip Arthroscopy After Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Rare (0.04%) and May be Contralateral.

Caitlin A Orner, Michael B Banffy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Caitlin A OrnerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee, Wisconsin, U.S.A.
Michael B BanffyCedars Sinai Kerlan Jobe Institute, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the patient demographics and incidence of hip arthroscopy after total hip arthroplasty using the PearlDiver database. Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty and arthroscopic hip surgery. The PearlDiver Claims Database was queried using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for records from 2010 to 2021. Inclusion criteria were presence of a hip arthroplasty CPT code, followed by a hip arthroscopy CPT code. Additional data collected included age, sex, and time between surgeries. A subanalysis for Results: Query of the database showed that 314 patients had a hip arthroscopy code after a hip arthroplasty code. In total, 0.04% of patients who underwent arthroplasty subsequently underwent arthroscopy; 63.4% were female. Mean age was 58.2 ± 12.2 years at time of arthroscopy. A total of 214 (72.3%) patients had a CPT code for synovectomy, 56 (18.9%) for loose body removal, and 44 (15.3%) for diagnostic arthroscopy. The mean time from arthroplasty code to arthroscopy code was 2.5 ± 2.0 years. In total, 105 patients (33.4%) also had an ICD-10 diagnosis code for iliopsoas tendinitis, and 116 (36.9.0%) had the ICD-9 code for enthesopathy of hip. Conclusions: In this study, we found that hip arthroscopy after hip arthroplasty is uncommon but occurs more frequently in female patients, is undertaken in a broad age range of patients, and often is associated with a diagnosis of iliopsoas or hip tendinitis. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Identifiers

PMID39776494
PMCPMC11701985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.