Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39776475›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Translation of a longitudinal survey of veterans' well-being into action by a research-practice-policy partnership.

Daniel F Perkins, Kimberly J McCarthy, Nicole R Morgan, Brandon A Balotti, Katie E Davenport, Keith R Aronson, William Lockwood, Megan Andros

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Co-Design of an Ecosystem of Services to Support Veteran Well-Being and Reduce Excessive Alcohol Consumption.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daniel F PerkinsClearinghouse for Military Family Readiness at Penn State (Clearinghouse), The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Kimberly J McCarthyClearinghouse for Military Family Readiness at Penn State (Clearinghouse), The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Nicole R MorganClearinghouse for Military Family Readiness at Penn State (Clearinghouse), The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Brandon A BalottiClearinghouse for Military Family Readiness at Penn State (Clearinghouse), The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Katie E DavenportClearinghouse for Military Family Readiness at Penn State (Clearinghouse), The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Keith R AronsonClearinghouse for Military Family Readiness at Penn State (Clearinghouse), The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
William LockwoodMay & Stanley Smith Charitable Trust, Corte Madera, CA, United States.
Megan AndrosThe Heinz Endowments, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Research-practice-policy partnerships are shifting the academic research paradigm toward collaboration and research-informed action at community and policy levels. In this case study, researchers partnered with philanthropic foundations to actualize data findings from a rigorous, longitudinal study. Context: In 2016, a survey of post-9/11 military veterans began assessing veterans' well-being in key domains: health, vocation (education and employment), finances, and social relationships. Data were collected from 9,566 veterans with three study aims: document factors affecting well-being, describe the use of transition-assistance programs and distill them into common components, and identify components associated with positive changes in veterans' well-being. Partnership formation and priorities: The study evolved into a partnership among an academic applied research center and philanthropic funders to disseminate survey findings, investigate additional research questions of practical application, and help ensure public and private funds are invested in evidence-informed programs and services that support veterans' well-being. Four RPP partnership goals were identified. Mechanisms and actions: Goal 1 included survey expansion to capture data on emerging concerns (e.g., COVID-19 impacts, educational experiences, burn pit exposure, civic engagement, social-media use). This resulted in eight waves of data collection over 6.5 years. Goal 2 involved co-interpretation of data to define successful military-to-civilian transition (MCT) and strategic communications to engage national leaders in policy change for veterans. Goal 3 focused on evaluation support of partners' organizational portfolios and programs, which resulted in new tools such as an online screener that veteran-serving providers could use to identify veterans' MCT risks and respond with tailored, research-informed resources and program components. Goal 4 allowed for the application of research findings with an innovative model for using longitudinal study variables within robust comparison analyses to assess partners' program components; propensity matching demonstrated that effective component use leads to better outcomes for veterans (e.g., higher salaries). Discussion: Partnerships can equip funders and service organizations with credible data, clear messaging, and tools to advocate for and champion the well-being of populations. This partnership, galvanized by using data for co-learning and collaborative action, has augmented the nation's understanding of veterans' reintegration and has led to veterans receiving data-driven support for successful transitions and enhanced well-being.

Indexed as

VeteransAdultAgedFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesapplied researchcoalitionslongitudinal surveymilitary-to-civilian transitionpartnershipspolicyscholarshipveterans

Identifiers

PMID39776475
PMCPMC11703825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.