ArticleStatistics and computing2024
Enhancing Cure Rate Analysis Through Integration of Machine Learning Models: A Comparative Study.
Article in Statistics and computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Sequential Quadratic Hamiltonian-Based Estimation Method for Box-Cox Transformation Cure Model.Statistica Neerlandica · 2026Article
- Modeling Cure from Cancer Accounting for Inevitable Mortality.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2026Article
- Fitting high-dimensional mixture cure models using the hdcuremodelsR package.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2026Article
- A Support vector machine-based mixture cure model for mixed case interval censored data.Statistics and computing · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Approach for Analyzing Mixed Case Interval Censored Data with a Cured Subgroup.Advances in statistical analysis : AStA : a journal of the German Statistical Society · 2025Article
- A Neural Network Integrated Accelerated Failure Time-Based Mixture Cure Model.Statistics and computing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cure rate models have been thoroughly investigated across various domains, encompassing medicine, reliability, and finance. The merging of machine learning (ML) with cure models is emerging as a promising strategy to improve predictive accuracy and gain profound insights into the underlying mechanisms influencing the probability of cure. The current body of literature has explored the benefits of incorporating a single ML algorithm with cure models. However, there is a notable absence of a comprehensive study that compares the performances of various ML algorithms in this context. This paper seeks to address and bridge this gap. Specifically, we focus on the well-known mixture cure model and examine the incorporation of five distinct ML algorithms: extreme gradient boosting, neural networks, support vector machines, random forests, and decision trees. To bolster the robustness of our comparison, we also include cure models with logistic and spline-based regression. For parameter estimation, we formulate an expectation maximization algorithm. A comprehensive simulation study is conducted across diverse scenarios to compare various models based on the accuracy and precision of estimates for different quantities of interest, along with the predictive accuracy of cure. The results derived from both the simulation study, as well as the analysis of real cutaneous melanoma data, indicate that the incorporation of ML models into cure model provides a beneficial contribution to the ongoing endeavors aimed at improving the accuracy of cure rate estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.