Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39776443›Full record

ArticleJournal of CME2025

Developing an Annual Review of the Literature.

Weinstein R Amy, Szauter Karen, Duca Nicholas, Jacob Jackcy, Ismail Nadia, Pincavage Amber, Walsh Katherine, Alexandraki Irene

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of CME, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Weinstein R AmyHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5789-1930
Szauter KarenOffice of Educational Affairs, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Duca NicholasDepartment of Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Jacob JackcyDepartment of Medicine, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA.
Ismail NadiaDepartment of Medicine, Huffington Department of Education, Innovation and Technology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Pincavage AmberDepartment of Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Walsh KatherineDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Alexandraki IreneOffice of Undergraduate Medical Education, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Pheonix, AZ, Pheonix.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many national meetings and speaker series feature an "Annual Review of the Literature" (ARL) session in which an individual or team presents a sampling of articles, selected and prepared because they represent important current topics or new ideas in the discipline of interest. Despite this, there is little in the medical literature describing how to thoughtfully and systematically develop these sessions. We identify best practices that we have developed and used in the United States Clerkship Directors of Internal Medicine (CDIM) over many years. These include identification of a theme, team assembly, timeline development, search strategy and rubric development and employment, and presentation planning strategies. Employing the steps described can help facilitate this otherwise arduous process.

Indexed as

clinical clerkshipEducationfaculty developmentmedicalprogram evaluationsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39776443
PMCPMC11703470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.