ArticleVirus genes2025
First report of the whole‑genome sequence analysis of Fig badnavirus 2 from China.
Article in Virus genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A novel plant virus was identified in fig trees exhibiting ring spot symptoms through high-throughput sequencing (HTS). The complete genome sequence was successfully determined using PCR and RT-PCR techniques. The virus features a circular DNA genome of 7233 nucleotides (nt) in length, encompassing four open reading frames (ORFs). ORF1 and ORF2 encode hypothetical proteins, while ORF3 encodes a putative polyprotein with conserved domains, including a zinc finger, aspartic protease, reverse transcriptase (RT), and RNase H. ORF4 encodes a putative protein of unknown function. Comparative nucleotide sequence analysis of the RT + RNase H region reveals 84.46% and 78.82% identity with grapevine badnavirus 1 (GBV-1, MF781082.1) and fig badnavirus 1 (FBV-1, MK348055.1), respectively. Notably, this virus's genomic organization diverges from GBV-1 but is similar to FBV-1. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrates that the three isolates of this virus form a distinct clade within the badnaviruses. Based on genomic structure and phylogenetic relationships, this novel virus represents a new member of the genus Badnavirus and is proposed to be named "Fig badnavirus 2" (FBV-2).
Indexed as
Identifiers
39776408What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.