ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2025
Ultrasound radiomics model based on grayscale transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy for diagnosing prostate cancer and predicting distant metastasis.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and evaluation of multimodal ultrasound radiomics models for predicting active inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveA prostate ultrasound (US) imaging omics model was established to assess its effectiveness in diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa), predicting Gleason score (GS), and determining the likelihood of distant metastasis.
methodsUS images of patients with prostate pathology confirmed by biopsy or surgery at our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Regions of interest (ROI) segmentation, feature extraction, feature screening, and the construction and training of the radiomics model were performed.
resultsArea under the curve (AUC) for the magnetic resonance imaging Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (MRI PI-RADS) classification, radiomics alone, and radiomics combined with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in diagnosing PCa were 70.74%, 71.13%, and 90.47%, respectively. AUCs for the MRI PI-RADS classification, radiomics alone, and radiomics combined with PSA in predicting the GS of PCa were 75.6%, 74.7%, and 88.9%, respectively. Furthermore, AUCs for MRI PI-RADS classification and radiomics alone in predicting distant metastasis of PCa were 66.7% and 90.8%, respectively.
conclusionThe combination of ultrasonic imaging omics and serum PSA significantly improves the efficiency of PCa diagnosis, GS prediction, and distant metastasis prediction. This method is an important tool for PCa screening and follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39776403What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.