Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39776345›Full record

SynthesisNeurocritical care2025

Diagnostic Accuracy of S100B in Predicting Intracranial Abnormalities on CT Imaging Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Armin Karamian, Hana Farzaneh, Masoud Khoshnoodi, Nazanin Maleki, Amin Karamian, Steven Stufflebeam, Brandon Lucke-Wold

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurocritical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Armin KaramianSchool of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hana FarzanehDepartment of Radiology (Neuroradiology) at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Masoud KhoshnoodiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Nazanin MalekiDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Amin KaramianDepartment of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Steven StufflebeamAthinoula Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Brandon Lucke-WoldDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. Brandon.Lucke-Wold@neurosurgery.ufl.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6577-4080

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of health loss and disabilities globally, burdening health care systems. Mild TBI is a common cause of emergency department visits. Computed tomography (CT) scans are the mainstay for acute TBI imaging. S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B) biomarker is promising for predicting intracranial lesions on CTs in mild TBI. A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted on PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane electronic databases to find eligible studies reporting the diagnostic performance of S100B. A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the predictive ability of S100B for CT imaging abnormalities. Of 1545 articles, 32 were included in our meta-analysis. At the threshold of 0.1 μg/L, a bivariate model showed a sensitivity of 89% (95% confidence interval [CI] 83-92) with a specificity of 32% (95% CI 26-39). The aggregate analysis containing all cutoffs showed the optimal cutoff of 0.751 μg/L with a sensitivity of 64% (95% CI 32-87) and a specificity of 85% (95% CI 76-92). The optimal diagnostic performance of S100B in patients with Glasgow Coma Scale 14-15 was estimated to be 0.05 μg/L, with a sensitivity of 98% (95% CI 92-99) and a negative predictive value of 99%. These findings indicate that S100B analysis could minimize the need for unnecessary CT scans in individuals with mild TBI. The test's diagnostic accuracy improves when the S100B analysis is done within 3 h of the injury. However, further research is warranted to validate its superiority to other biomarkers before considering it the standard routine for managing mild TBI.

Indexed as

Brain ConcussionS100 Calcium Binding Protein beta SubunitTomography, X-Ray ComputedBiomarkersHumansSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkersS100B protein, humanS100 Calcium Binding Protein beta SubunitBiomarkerComputed tomographyS100BTBITraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.