SynthesisNeurocritical care2025
Diagnostic Accuracy of S100B in Predicting Intracranial Abnormalities on CT Imaging Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurocritical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Evidence-based indications for repeat head CT after mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of blast-induced traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- GFAP and UCH-L1 for Ruling out Intracranial Lesions After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Biomarkers and clinical rules for the management of mild traumatic brain injury: a narrative review.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Review
- CT Brain Utilization After Low-Risk Head Injury in Adults: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Literature Review.Cureus · 2026Article
- A scoping review on the essential role of global neurotrauma in achieving the sustainable development goals.Discover public health · 2026Review
- Negative predictive value of S100B in all types of traumatic brain injury in different aging groups.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Biomarker role in assessing imaging needs for mild cranial trauma (BRAIN-CT): study protocol for a single-center, randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of health loss and disabilities globally, burdening health care systems. Mild TBI is a common cause of emergency department visits. Computed tomography (CT) scans are the mainstay for acute TBI imaging. S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B) biomarker is promising for predicting intracranial lesions on CTs in mild TBI. A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted on PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane electronic databases to find eligible studies reporting the diagnostic performance of S100B. A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the predictive ability of S100B for CT imaging abnormalities. Of 1545 articles, 32 were included in our meta-analysis. At the threshold of 0.1 μg/L, a bivariate model showed a sensitivity of 89% (95% confidence interval [CI] 83-92) with a specificity of 32% (95% CI 26-39). The aggregate analysis containing all cutoffs showed the optimal cutoff of 0.751 μg/L with a sensitivity of 64% (95% CI 32-87) and a specificity of 85% (95% CI 76-92). The optimal diagnostic performance of S100B in patients with Glasgow Coma Scale 14-15 was estimated to be 0.05 μg/L, with a sensitivity of 98% (95% CI 92-99) and a negative predictive value of 99%. These findings indicate that S100B analysis could minimize the need for unnecessary CT scans in individuals with mild TBI. The test's diagnostic accuracy improves when the S100B analysis is done within 3 h of the injury. However, further research is warranted to validate its superiority to other biomarkers before considering it the standard routine for managing mild TBI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39776345What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.