ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025
Posttranscriptional Control of Neural Progenitors Temporal Dynamics During Neocortical Development by Syncrip.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preclinical serum alterations and tissue changes in protein and gene expression of early cerebrospinal fluid-validated biomarkers in scrapie.Veterinary research · 2026Article
- AnnQ: reference-based quantification of cellular abnormality at single-cell resolution.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Review
- Liquid-liquid phase separation in neural development.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026Review
- From development to disease: the neuronal role of hnRNPs through the lens ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Posttranscriptional Control of Neural Progenitors Temporal Dynamics During Neocortical Development by Syncrip.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of the mammalian neocortex is precisely regulated by temporal gene expression, yet the temporal regulatory mechanisms of cortical neurogenesis, particularly how radial glial cells (RGCs) sequentially generate deep to superficial neurons, remain unclear. Here, the hnRNP family member Syncrip (hnRNP Q) is identified as a key modulator of superficial neuronal differentiation in neocortical neurogenesis. Syncrip knockout in RGCs disrupts differentiation and abnormal neuronal localization, ultimately resulting in superficial cortical layer defects as well as learning and memory impairments in mice. Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis demonstrated that the knockout of Syncrip disrupts the late-stage neurogenesis, stalling transcriptional progression in RGCs. Mechanistically, Syncrip maintains the transcription of temporal process-related transcription factors by recruiting stabilization complexes through phase separation, crucially regulating the Notch signaling pathway that determines the fate of RGCs. Furthermore, pathogenic human mutations in Syncrip weaken its phase-separation capability, failing to form stable complexes normally. Thus, Syncrip acts as a mediator of posttranscriptional regulatory mechanisms, governing the fate progression of RGCs and the advancement of intrinsic temporal programs. This study establishes an intracellular mechanism for posttranscriptional regulation of progressive fate determination in cortical neurogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.