ReviewBreast cancer research and treatment2025
Oral selective estrogen receptor degraders for breast cancer treatment: focus on pharmacological differences.
Review in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Oral selective estrogen receptor degraders in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Pooled it
- Association between air pollution and dry eye: insights from network toxicology and molecular docking analysis.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe management of hormone receptor-positive (HR +) breast cancer (BC) relies on endocrine therapy (ET), with a primary focus on disrupting estrogen receptor (ER) signaling due to its critical role in BC tumorigenesis and progression. While effective for both early-stage and advanced breast cancers, ET frequently encounters resistance mechanisms, including both ligand-dependent and ligand-independent trajectories, ultimately leading to disease progression.
methodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus databases to review the current evidence on the use of novel oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) for the treatment of HR+ BC.
conclusionsSomatic activating mutations of the estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) gene are known to sustain ER activity, boost ER-dependent gene transcription, and foster resistance to ET. The most significant gap remains after treatment failure with ET and cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors, where fulvestrant monotherapy typically results in a median progression-free survival of 2-3 months. Novel compounds, including oral SERDs, have been explored for their potential to overcome therapeutic resistance, both as monotherapy and in combination with other targeted therapies. Herein, we provide an overview on the latest findings on oral SERDs, examining their mechanism of action, safety data, and pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39776334What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.