ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2025
Shifting from axillary dissection to targeted axillary surgery after neoadjuvant treatment: the evolving management of occult breast cancer in a monoinstitutional series of 114 patients.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Is Mastectomy Necessary in Patients with Occult Breast Cancer and Advanced (N2/N3) Nodal Disease?Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Observational
- Clipped Node Pathology as a Guide for Limited Axillary Surgery in Occult Breast Cancer.Annals of surgery · 2026Article
- AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2026.Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Role of Quantitative Ultrasound in Monitoring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Narrative Review.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy for primary breast cancer can achieve tumor shrinkage, enabling less invasive surgical treatments, such as breast-conserving surgery instead of mastectomy, and sentinel node biopsy instead of axillary dissection. In recent years, an increasing number of studies have explored the use of primary systemic therapy for occult breast cancer with axillary presentation. These studies suggest that a more conservative approach, involving targeted axillary surgery could be cautiously proposed for occult breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in selected patients. In cases where a complete pathological response in the lymph nodes is achieved, there may also be the possibility to omit radiotherapy.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed surgical interventions for carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) syndrome with axillary presentation at the European Institute of Oncology from April 2004 to October 2022. Demographic and clinicopathological characteristics of the patients were collected and follow-up information has been updated.
resultsA total of 114 patients who underwent axillary surgery for occult breast cancer were included. The 5-year disease-free survival was 74.5%, while overall survival was 88.5%. A total of 22.8% of patients underwent neoadjuvant treatment. Complete pathological response was achieved in 38.5%. Patients with complete nodal pathological response showed fewer events compared to patients with no complete pathological response after neoadjuvant treatment.
conclusionAlthough the sample size is limited, recent advances in breast cancer multimodal treatment indicate that targeted axillary surgery may be considered for the rare clinical presentation of occult breast cancer after neoadjuvant treatment. TRIAL REGISTRY: Trial registration number UID 4184 24/07/2024 "retrospectively registered".
Indexed as
Identifiers
39776333What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.