Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39776302›Full record

ArticleInternational forum of allergy & rhinology2025

Machine Learning of Endoscopy Images to Identify, Classify, and Segment Sinonasal Masses.

Lirit Levi, Kenan Ye, Maxime Fieux, Axel Renteria, Steven Lin, Lei Xing, Noel F Ayoub, Zara M Patel, Jayakar V Nayak, Peter H Hwang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International forum of allergy & rhinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lirit LeviDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7075-8752
Kenan YeDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Maxime FieuxDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8317-2286
Axel RenteriaDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Steven LinDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Lei XingDepartment of Radiation Oncology-Radiation Physics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Noel F AyoubDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1867-994X
Zara M PatelDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2072-982X
Jayakar V NayakDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4454-0861
Peter H HwangDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0786-4675
Michael T ChangDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9519-5880

Funding

Association Française de RhinologieDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of MedicineFondation Edmond RoudnitskaFoundation of the Hospices Civil de Lyon fellowshipFrance-Stanford CenterPhilippe Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe developed and assessed the performance of a machine learning model (MLM) to identify, classify, and segment sinonasal masses based on endoscopic appearance.

methodsA convolutional neural network-based model was constructed from nasal endoscopy images from patients evaluated at an otolaryngology center between 2013 and 2024. Images were classified into four groups: normal endoscopy, nasal polyps, benign, and malignant tumors. Polyps and tumors were confirmed with histopathological diagnosis. Images were annotated by an otolaryngologist and independently verified by two other otolaryngologists. We used high- and low-quality images to mirror real-world conditions. The models used for classification (EfficientNet-B2) and segmentation (nnUNet) were trained, validated, and tested at an 8:1:1 ratio. The performance accuracy was averaged across a 10-fold cross-validation assessment. Segmentation accuracy was assessed via Dice similarity coefficients.

resultsA total of 1242 images from 311 patients were used. The MLM was trained, validated, and tested on 663 normal, 276 polyps, 157 benign, and 146 malignant tumors images. Overall, the model performed at 84.1 ± 4.3% accuracy in the validation set and 80.4 ± 1.7% in the test set. The model correctly identified the presence of a sinonasal mass at 90.5 ± 1.2% accuracy rate. The MLM accuracy performance rates were 86.2 ± 1.0% for polyps and 84.1 ± 1.8% for tumors. Benign and malignant tumor subclassification achieved 87.8 ± 2.1% and 94.0 ± 2.4% accuracy, respectively. Segmentation accuracies for polyps were 72.3% and 72.8% for tumors.

conclusionsAn MLM for nasal endoscopy images can perform with moderate to high accuracy in identifying, classifying, and segmenting sinonasal masses. Performance in future iterations may improve with larger and more diverse training datasets.

Indexed as

EndoscopyMachine LearningNasal PolypsNose NeoplasmsParanasal SinusesParanasal Sinus NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, Computerartificial intelligencechronic rhinosinusitisparanasal sinus diseasespolyp

Identifiers

PMID39776302
PMCPMC12048764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.