ArticleInternational forum of allergy & rhinology2025
Machine Learning of Endoscopy Images to Identify, Classify, and Segment Sinonasal Masses.
Article in International forum of allergy & rhinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Performance Evaluation of Federated and Centralized Learning for Velum and OTE Segmentation in Sleep Endoscopy Images.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Beyond whole-image learning: anatomically partitioned deep learning models for superior sinonasal disease classification.European radiology · 2026Article
- The Application and Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Rhinology: A Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Comparison of clinical nasal endoscopy, optical biopsy, and artificial intelligence in early diagnosis and treatment planning in laryngeal cancer: a prospective observational study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe developed and assessed the performance of a machine learning model (MLM) to identify, classify, and segment sinonasal masses based on endoscopic appearance.
methodsA convolutional neural network-based model was constructed from nasal endoscopy images from patients evaluated at an otolaryngology center between 2013 and 2024. Images were classified into four groups: normal endoscopy, nasal polyps, benign, and malignant tumors. Polyps and tumors were confirmed with histopathological diagnosis. Images were annotated by an otolaryngologist and independently verified by two other otolaryngologists. We used high- and low-quality images to mirror real-world conditions. The models used for classification (EfficientNet-B2) and segmentation (nnUNet) were trained, validated, and tested at an 8:1:1 ratio. The performance accuracy was averaged across a 10-fold cross-validation assessment. Segmentation accuracy was assessed via Dice similarity coefficients.
resultsA total of 1242 images from 311 patients were used. The MLM was trained, validated, and tested on 663 normal, 276 polyps, 157 benign, and 146 malignant tumors images. Overall, the model performed at 84.1 ± 4.3% accuracy in the validation set and 80.4 ± 1.7% in the test set. The model correctly identified the presence of a sinonasal mass at 90.5 ± 1.2% accuracy rate. The MLM accuracy performance rates were 86.2 ± 1.0% for polyps and 84.1 ± 1.8% for tumors. Benign and malignant tumor subclassification achieved 87.8 ± 2.1% and 94.0 ± 2.4% accuracy, respectively. Segmentation accuracies for polyps were 72.3% and 72.8% for tumors.
conclusionsAn MLM for nasal endoscopy images can perform with moderate to high accuracy in identifying, classifying, and segmenting sinonasal masses. Performance in future iterations may improve with larger and more diverse training datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.