Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39776101›Full record

Trial reportAnaesthesia2025

Recurrence-free survival after hepatectomy using propofol-based total intravenous anaesthesia and sevoflurane-based inhalational anaesthesia: a randomised controlled study.

Ji-Hye Kwon, Jeayoun Kim, Hyean Yeo, Keoungah Kim, Jinsoo Rhu, Gyu-Seong Choi, Jongman Kim, Jae-Won Joh, Kyunga Kim, Min-Ji Kim and 6 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. General and Regional Anaesthesia in Cancer Surgery: A 20-year Bibliometric Analysis.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Ji-Hye KwonDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Jeayoun KimDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyean YeoDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, CHA Ilsan Medical Centre, CHA University, Ilsan, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.
Keoungah KimDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Dankook University Dental Hospital, Cheonan, Chungcheongnam-do, South Korea.
Jinsoo RhuDepartment of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Gyu-Seong ChoiDepartment of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Jongman KimDepartment of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Jae-Won JohDepartment of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Kyunga KimBiomedical Statistics Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Min-Ji KimBiomedical Statistics Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Ji Seon JeongDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Jong-Hwan LeeDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Sangbin HanDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Justin S KoDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Mi Sook GwakDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Gaab Soo KimDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Funding

Korea Health Technology Research and DevelopmentMinistry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea HI22C189500Ministry of Science and Information and Communication Technology of Korean Government 2021R1F1A106299613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile evidence from preclinical and observational cohort studies have suggested potential disparities in tumour behaviour associated with the choice of intra-operative anaesthetics, clinical evidence of tumour recurrence and metastasis remains inconclusive. We aimed to compare the impact of intra-operative anaesthesia on oncologic outcomes following hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

methodsAdult patients scheduled for elective hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma were assigned randomly (1:1) to either propofol-based total intravenous anaesthesia or sevoflurane-based inhalational anaesthesia. For recurrence-free survival, overall survival, intrahepatic recurrence-free survival and extrahepatic recurrence-free survival, the survival curves of the two groups were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. The primary outcome was one-year recurrence-free survival.

resultsAmong the 536 patients enrolled, primary analysis comprised 228 and 226 patients in the total intravenous anaesthesia and sevoflurane-based inhalational anaesthesia groups, respectively. The probability of recurrence-free survival at one year was 79.1% (47 events) and 77.7% (50 events) in the total intravenous anaesthesia and sevoflurane-based inhalational anaesthesia groups, respectively (adjusted hazard ratio 1.04, 95%CI 0.72-1.52). The probability of intrahepatic and extrahepatic recurrence-free survival, as well as overall survival at one year, was not significantly different between total intravenous anaesthesia and sevoflurane-based inhalational anaesthesia: 81.3% (42 events) vs. 81.7% (41 events); 91.5% (19 events) vs. 88.8% (25 events); 99.1% (2 events) vs. 100.0% (no event), respectively. Subgroup analyses revealed that in patients undergoing open hepatectomy, total intravenous anaesthesia was associated with a significantly lower hazard of tumour recurrence or death (hazard ratio 0.49, 95%CI 0.25-0.95, p = 0.034), while in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, no significant difference was observed (hazard ratio 1.14, 95%CI 0.73-1.80, p = 0.558). DISCUSSION: Intra-operative anaesthesia technique did not affect postoperative recurrence and overall survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing hepatectomy.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, InhalationAnesthesia, IntravenousAnesthetics, InhalationAnesthetics, IntravenousCarcinoma, HepatocellularHepatectomyLiver NeoplasmsMethyl EthersPropofolAdultAgedDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAnesthetics, InhalationAnesthetics, IntravenousMethyl EthersPropofolSevofluraneanaesthesiacancer recurrenceshepatocellular carcinomapropofolsevoflurane

Identifiers

PMID39776101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.