Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39776100›Full record

ArticleNursing & health sciences2025

Development of a Questionnaire Assessing Nurses' Situational Awareness to Missed Care.

Marina Vexler, Anat Drach-Zahavy, Einav Srulovici

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing & health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marina VexlerThe Cheryl Spencer Department of Nursing, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4838-6403
Anat Drach-ZahavyThe Cheryl Spencer Department of Nursing, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1826-5117
Einav SruloviciThe Cheryl Spencer Department of Nursing, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1291-8284

Funding

The Cheryl Spencer Institute of Nursing Research, The University of Haifa, Israel
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and validate the Situational Nursing Awareness Probe-Missed Nursing Care Edition (SNAP-MNC) questionnaire, a novel tool designed to assess nurses' situational awareness in the context of missed nursing care. Data were collected from March to October 2022, following a rigorous five-phase questionnaire development process. The five-item questionnaire was developed through literature review and expert evaluation, establishing face and content validity. It was tested with 190 nurses across three shifts. Construct validity was assessed via confirmatory factor analysis, reliability via Cronbach's alpha, and criterion validity by correlating with the MISSCARE survey. The final five-item questionnaire demonstrated suitability for assessing personal situational awareness. The findings established content, construct, criterion validity, and good internal reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis displayed suitable loadings and an excellent fit to a one-dimensional model. Nurses received, on average, low situational awareness scores. The SNAP-MNC effectively assesses nurses' situational awareness, focusing on missed nursing care. This tool evaluates the identification of relevant clinical factors, understanding their implications, and projecting strategies to address challenges, offering actionable insights for improving nursing care quality and outcomes.

Indexed as

AwarenessNursesPsychometricsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesdevelopmentfactor analysishealth care rationinginstrumentmissed nursing carepersonal situational awarenessvalidation

Identifiers

PMID39776100
PMCPMC11707498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.