Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39776051›Full record

ReviewCardiology journal2025

Maintenance therapy with a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor after cangrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome. The ELECTRA-SIRIO 2 investigators' viewpoint.

Jacek Kubica, Piotr Adamski, Robert Gajda, Aldona Kubica, Małgorzata Ostrowska, Gavino Casu, Diana A Gorog, Paul A Gurbel, Tomasz Hajdukiewicz, Miłosz Jaguszewski and 14 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Jacek KubicaDepartment of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8250-754X
Piotr AdamskiDepartment of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9719-0987
Robert GajdaGajda-Med District Hospital in Pultusk, Poland.
Aldona KubicaDepartment of Cardiac Rehabilitation and Health Promotion, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4608-0881
Małgorzata OstrowskaDepartment of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland. m.ostrowska@cm.umk.pl.ORCID 0000-0002-3377-2950
Gavino CasuDepartment of Clinical and Interventional Cardiology, Sassari University Hospital, Sassari, Italy.
Diana A GorogFaculty of Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Paul A GurbelSinai Center for Thrombosis Research, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, USA.
Tomasz HajdukiewiczDepartment of Cardiology, Provincial Hospital, Elblag, Poland.
Miłosz JaguszewskiDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Young-Hoon JeongCAU Thrombosis and Biomarker Center, Heart and Brain Hospital, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Gwangmyeong, Korea.
Agata Kosobucka-OzdobaDepartment of Cardiac Rehabilitation and Health Promotion, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Zuzana MotovskaCardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.
Piotr NiezgodaDepartment of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9912-9730
Maciej PiaseckiDepartment of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Przemysław PodhajskiDepartment of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Paolo RaggiDivision of Cardiology and Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Uzeyir RahimovDepartement of Cardiology, Baku Medical Plaza Hospitals, Azerbaijan.
Jolanta M Siller-MatulaDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.
Grzegorz SkoniecznyChair of the Cardiology Clinic Ward and Acute Cardiac Care Unit, L. Rydygier Provincial Integrated Hospital, Torun, Poland.
Łukasz SzarpakHenry JN Taub Department of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Paweł SzymańskiDepartment of Cardiology, Interventional Cardiology and Electrophysiology with Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Tertiary Care Hospital in Grudziadz, Poland.
Udaya TantrySinai Center for Thrombosis Research, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Eliano P NavareseDepartment of Clinical and Interventional Cardiology, Sassari University Hospital, Sassari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to the ESC guidelines, cangrelor may be considered in P2Y12-inhibitor-naïve acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this review is to summarize available evidence on the optimal maintenance therapy with P2Y12 receptor inhibitor after cangrelor. Transitioning from cangrelor to a thienopyridine, but not ticagrelor, can be associated with a drug-drug interaction (DDI); therefore, a ticagrelor loading dose (LD) can be given any time before, during, or at the end of a cangrelor infusion, while a LD of clopidogrel or prasugrel should be administered at the time the infusion of cangrelor ends or within 30 minutes before the end of infusion in the case of a LD of prasugrel. Administration of any oral antiplatelet agent at the end of a cangrelor infusion will also result in a transient period of increased platelet reactivity. The inter-individual variability of this period is difficult to predict because it depends on many factors related to the patient and the treatment. In addition, experimental studies indicate that cangrelor may exert a cardioprotective effect beyond the blockade of platelet aggregation. Considering the available data, the potential use of cangrelor in ACS patients goes well beyond the current indications. Furthermore, we believe that it might be prudent to avoid use of thienopyridines during and soon after a cangrelor infusion until conclusive data on the effect of the DDI on the clinical outcome are available. On the other hand, ticagrelor seems to be an optimal oral agent for continuation of P2Y12 inhibition in patients receiving cangrelor infusion.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeAdenosine MonophosphatePercutaneous Coronary InterventionPurinergic P2Y Receptor AntagonistsDrug InteractionsHumansPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsTreatment OutcomeAdenosine MonophosphatecangrelorPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPurinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonistsantiplatelet therapycangrelorP2Y12 receptor inhibitionticagrelor

Identifiers

PMID39776051
PMCPMC11870009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.