Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39775997›Full record

ArticleEmergency radiology2025

Outcome of follow-up computed tomography of suspected occult scaphoid fracture after normal radiography.

Mats Geijer, Eirikur Gunnlaugsson, Linnea Arvidsson, Elin Österhed, Magnus Tägil

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mats GeijerDepartment of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. mats.geijer@gu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0529-7723
Eirikur GunnlaugssonDepartment of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Linnea ArvidssonDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4888-9836
Elin ÖsterhedSkåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Magnus TägilDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the rate of missed scaphoid fractures on follow-up computed tomography (CT) for suspected occult scaphoid fracture after normal radiography with residual radial-sided wrist pain.

methodsIn a retrospective analysis, wrist CT during a five-year period was analyzed. The CT examinations and radiological reports were re-evaluated. Available clinical findings and radiologic follow-up performed during a period of a minimum of three years served as outcome reference.

resultsIn total, 178 examinations had been performed on 174 patients for suspect scaphoid fracture, 67 men and 107 women, showing 15 and 6 scaphoid fractures, respectively; a statistically significant sex difference (p = 0.0024). In 157 examinations, no scaphoid fracture was detected on CT, instead 29 other wrist or carpal bone fractures were found. On follow-up, no missed scaphoid fractures were found. Before CT, 124 of the 157 patients had been treated with a cast. After CT, 35 patients continued with cast treatment for a median of 14 days.

conclusionsCT appears to be a reliable method for evaluating suspect scaphoid fracture as part of a diagnosis-treatment regimen including pain immobilization with a plaster cast.

Indexed as

ArthralgiaCasts, SurgicalFractures, ClosedTomography, X-Ray ComputedWrist FracturesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarpal BonesChildFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedComputed tomographyDiagnosisOccult fractureScaphoid fracture

Identifiers

PMID39775997
PMCPMC11790721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.