ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2025
Success of the German Cystic Fibrosis Registry.
Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Exploring the utilisation and effectiveness of implementation science strategies by cystic fibrosis registries for healthcare improvement: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025Pooled it
- Moving beyond treatment: pulmonary function, autonomous motivation, and physical activity enjoyment in adults with cystic fibrosis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Off-label treatment with elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor in people with cystic fibrosis: real-world evidence from the German CF Registry.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Long-term impact of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on small and large airways in people with cystic fibrosis aged ≥6 years: 24-month real-world evidence from the German Cystic Fibrosis Registry.ERJ open research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The German Cystic Fibrosis (CF) Registry (GCFR) is a national General Data Protection Regulation-compliant centralised database sponsored by the German Cystic Fibrosis Association (Mukoviszidose e.V.) and based on informed consent for each participating patient, ethical approval, and data protection votes. The aims of the GCFR are to optimise quality of care for CF at the centres, generate epidemiologic overviews, address research questions related to improved CF care, and inform caregivers, patients (aimed at patient empowerment), and health authorities and industry (aimed at care planning and pharmacovigilance). Established in 1995, the Registry has captured data on > 9600 individuals with a combined total of more than 140 000 annual assessments with an estimated coverage rate of > 90%. Patient data are collected after informed consent and confirmed diagnosis of CF, or a CFTR-related disorder, or a screening-positive inconclusive diagnosis of CF (i.e., CFSPID). The registry collects core, encounter, and annual health data. Data include demographics, anthropometrics, lung function, microbiology, CF-specific complications and chronic medications, hospitalisations, demand-oriented antibiotic therapies, and outcomes (death and transplants). Real world and pharmacovigilance studies have been published and additional research underway; there is a formal process for requesting access to the GCFR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.