ReviewArchives of dermatological research2025
Local flap guidance for scalp reconstruction following Mohs micrographic surgery.
Review in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Keratinocyte carcinomas (KCs) are commonly located on the scalp and often treated with excision with peripheral and deep en face margin assessment (PDEMA), with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) being the most frequently used method. Resection of these malignancies results in wounds with a wide variety of sizes, ranging from small, sub-centimeter defects, to extensive, nearly complete scalp defects. MMS is often the preferred treatment for tumor resection and margin clearance, as it allows for maximal healthy tissue preservation and has the lowest recurrence rates. Multiple local flap reconstruction options exist, and the selection depends on the size and location of the defect. This review highlights the indications, typical locations, potential risks, and advantages of frequently used local flaps on the scalp, accompanied by artistic representations of each flap herein. An exhaustive list of the local scalp flaps discussed in this review includes single, bilateral, and triple rotation flaps, the pinwheel flap, the double hatchet flap, the triple rhomboid flap, both the unilateral and bilateral banner flaps with split thickness skin grafts, A to T flaps, H-plasty flaps, single and double bridge flaps, and the pacman flap. Inelasticity of the scalp inhibits tissue movement so flaps on the scalp must be designed to be much larger than flaps in most other facial locations. One of the greatest benefits of working with local flaps on the scalp is often the presence of hair-bearing skin which provides the reconstructive surgeon the ability to hide significant scars under hair-bearing scalp, and the ability to perform wound repair under local anesthetic immediately following tumor removal by MMS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39775952What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.