Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39775952›Full record

ReviewArchives of dermatological research2025

Local flap guidance for scalp reconstruction following Mohs micrographic surgery.

Travis S Dowdle, Brinda Chellappan, Juan M Pinto-Cuberos, Kritin K Verma, Andrew M Armenta, Frank T Winsett, Richard F Wagner

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Travis S DowdleDepartment of Dermatology, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, 4.112, McCullough Building, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA. Tsdowdle@utmb.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5782-2935
Brinda ChellappanDepartment of Dermatology, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, 4.112, McCullough Building, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA.
Juan M Pinto-CuberosDepartment of Dermatology, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, 4.112, McCullough Building, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA.
Kritin K VermaTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center-School of Medicine, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Andrew M ArmentaDepartment of Dermatology, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, 4.112, McCullough Building, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA.
Frank T WinsettDepartment of Dermatology, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, 4.112, McCullough Building, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA.
Richard F WagnerDepartment of Dermatology, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, 4.112, McCullough Building, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Keratinocyte carcinomas (KCs) are commonly located on the scalp and often treated with excision with peripheral and deep en face margin assessment (PDEMA), with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) being the most frequently used method. Resection of these malignancies results in wounds with a wide variety of sizes, ranging from small, sub-centimeter defects, to extensive, nearly complete scalp defects. MMS is often the preferred treatment for tumor resection and margin clearance, as it allows for maximal healthy tissue preservation and has the lowest recurrence rates. Multiple local flap reconstruction options exist, and the selection depends on the size and location of the defect. This review highlights the indications, typical locations, potential risks, and advantages of frequently used local flaps on the scalp, accompanied by artistic representations of each flap herein. An exhaustive list of the local scalp flaps discussed in this review includes single, bilateral, and triple rotation flaps, the pinwheel flap, the double hatchet flap, the triple rhomboid flap, both the unilateral and bilateral banner flaps with split thickness skin grafts, A to T flaps, H-plasty flaps, single and double bridge flaps, and the pacman flap. Inelasticity of the scalp inhibits tissue movement so flaps on the scalp must be designed to be much larger than flaps in most other facial locations. One of the greatest benefits of working with local flaps on the scalp is often the presence of hair-bearing skin which provides the reconstructive surgeon the ability to hide significant scars under hair-bearing scalp, and the ability to perform wound repair under local anesthetic immediately following tumor removal by MMS.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsMohs SurgeryPlastic Surgery ProceduresScalpSkin NeoplasmsSurgical FlapsHumansKeratinocytesSkin TransplantationAdvancement flapsBiobraneDermatologic surgeryIntegra matrix wound dressingLocal flapsMohs micrographic surgeryPuracolReconstructionRotation flapsScalpSkin cancerTransposition flapsWound

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.