ArticleJournal of neurology2025
Open-label evaluation of oral trehalose in patients with neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Flupirtine Benzyl Carbamate Improves Neurocognitive Deficits and Molecular Pathology in theCells · 2026Article
- Sex-specific and age-related progression of auditory neurophysiological deficits in the Cln3 mouse model of Batten disease.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2025Article
- Trehalose Ameliorates Zebrafish Emotional and Social Deficits Caused by CLN8 Dysfunction.Cells · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCLs) are incurable pediatric neurodegenerative diseases characterized by accumulation of lysosomal material and dysregulation of autophagy. Given the promising results of treatment with trehalose, an autophagy inducer, in cell and animal models of NCL, we conducted an open-label, non-placebo-controlled, non-randomized 12-month prospective study in NCL patients receiving oral trehalose (4 g/day). All were treated with a commercially available formulation for 6 months, followed by a 6-month washout. The primary endpoint was the presence of severe adverse reactions during treatment; secondary endpoints were clinical changes documented using the validated Unified Batten Disease Rating Scale and the Hamburg scale. Leveraging on our recent multiomic studies identifying convergent biomarkers in NCLs, fluid biomarker changes were taken as additional secondary endpoints. Of the 17 patients enrolled, 11 completed the study. Oral intake of trehalose in NCL patients with different genetic forms and at different disease stages was found to be well tolerated over 6 months. Oral trehalose is associated with subjective benefits reported by caregivers, but not with improvement or worsening on clinical scales. Analysis of potential biomarkers demonstrated significant differences between patients and controls at baseline, but we observed no modifications over time, or correlations with clinical scales and treatment. In our pilot experience in a heterogeneous disease group of NCL, oral trehalose seemed safe for patients. While subjective improvements were reported by caregivers, larger multicenter randomized placebo-controlled studies, and perhaps additional clinical tools covering multiple functions affected by the disease, will be needed to identify possible improvements in clinical scale scores and biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39775944What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.