ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2025
Fungal communities in boreal soils are influenced by land use, agricultural soil management, and depth.
Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Land use and agricultural soil management affect soil fungal communities that ultimately influence soil health. Subsoils harbor nutrient reservoir for plants and can play a significant role in plant growth and soil carbon sequestration. Typically, microbial analyses are restricted to topsoil (0-30 cm) leaving subsoil fungal communities underexplored. To address this knowledge gap, we analyzed fungal communities in the vertical profile of four boreal soil treatments: long-term (24 years) organic and conventional crop rotation, meadow, and forest. Internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) amplicon sequencing revealed soil-layer-specific land use or agricultural soil management effects on fungal communities down to the deepest measured soil layer (40-80 cm). Compared to other treatments, higher proportion of symbiotrophs, saprotrophs, and pathotrophs + plant pathogens were found in forest, meadow and crop rotations, respectively. The proportion of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi was higher in deeper (>20 cm) soil than in topsoil. Forest soil below 20 cm was dominated by fungal functional groups with proposed interactions with plants or other soil biota, whether symbiotrophic or pathotrophic. Ferrous oxide was an important factor shaping fungal communities throughout the vertical profile of meadow and cropping systems. Our results emphasize the importance of including subsoil in microbial community analyses in differently managed soils.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.