ArticleNeuro-oncology2025
Development and validation of a molecular classifier of meningiomas.
Article in Neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modern molecular profiling recontextualizes the NRG/RTOG 0539 trial and reveals hidden high-risk and radiotherapy-resistant meningiomas.Neuro-oncology · 2026Trial
- Epigenetic Alterations in Meningiomas-A Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Optic nerve sheath meningioma exhibits neural niche-associated transcriptomic features and rare copy number variation-linked evolution.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multidisciplinary management of meningiomas in the era of precision oncology.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- MIB-1 index predicts low recurrence risk after subtotal resection of meningiomas: a retrospective study of 505 patients.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Spatially resolved single-cell analyses of human meningioma identify novel cell states influencing tumor microenvironment and progression.Nature genetics · 2026Article
- Assessment of molecular tools in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult meningioma highlights the need for lifespan precision in neuro-oncology.Neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Deficiency of SMARCB1 drives an immunosuppressive microenvironment in meningioma.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2026Article
- Adjuvant radiotherapy for WHO grade II meningiomas: the unanswered question.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Development, validation, and utility of a clinically applicable methylation classifier for recurrence risk prediction in meningiomas.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2025Article
- Article
- Impact of Irradiation on Post-Surgical Residuals of WHO Grade I Meningioma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Meningioma: Novel Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approaches.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Context-specific targeting of focal adhesion kinase in brain tumors: lessons from glioblastoma and neurofibromatosis type 2-mutant meningioma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Long-term outcomes of active surveillance after DOTATATE PET/MRI-confirmed gross total resection in WHO grade 2 meningioma.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMeningiomas exhibit considerable clinical and biological heterogeneity. We previously identified 4 distinct molecular groups (immunogenic, NF2-wildtype, hypermetabolic, and proliferative) that address much of this heterogeneity. Despite the utility of these groups, the stochasticity of clustering methods and the use of multi-omics data for discovery limits the potential for classifying prospective cases. We sought to address this with a dedicated classifier.
methodsUsing an international cohort of 1698 meningiomas, we constructed and rigorously validated a machine learning-based molecular classifier using only DNA methylation data as input. Original and newly predicted molecular groups were compared using DNA methylation, RNA sequencing, copy number profiles, whole-exome sequencing, and clinical outcomes.
resultsWe show that group-specific outcomes in the validation cohort are nearly identical to those originally described, with median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7.4 (4.9-Inf) years in hypermetabolic tumors and 2.5 (2.3-5.3) years in proliferative tumors (not reached in the other groups). Tumors classified as NF2-wildtype had no NF2 mutations, and 51.4% had canonical mutations previously described in this group. RNA pathway analysis revealed upregulation of immune-related pathways in the immunogenic group, metabolic pathways in the hypermetabolic group, and cell cycle programs in the proliferative group. Bulk deconvolution similarly revealed the enrichment of macrophages in immunogenic tumors and neoplastic cells in hypermetabolic and proliferative tumors with similar proportions to those originally described.
conclusionsOur DNA methylation-based classifier, which is publicly available for immediate clinical use, recapitulates the biology and outcomes of the original molecular groups as assessed using multiple metrics/platforms that were not used in its training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.