Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39775861›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of clinical oncology2025

Chronological changes in etiology, pathological and imaging findings in primary liver cancer from 2001 to 2020.

Junya Tsuzaki, Akihisa Ueno, Yohei Masugi, Masashi Tamura, Seiichiro Yamazaki, Kosuke Matsuda, Yutaka Kurebayashi, Hiroto Sakai, Yoichi Yokoyama, Yuta Abe and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Junya TsuzakiDepartment of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Akihisa UenoDivision of Diagnostic Pathology, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9428-4128
Yohei MasugiDepartment of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Masashi TamuraDepartment of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Seiichiro YamazakiDepartment of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kosuke MatsudaDepartment of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yutaka KurebayashiDepartment of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroto SakaiDepartment of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoichi YokoyamaDepartment of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuta AbeDepartment of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Koki HayashiDepartment of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasushi HasegawaDepartment of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi YagiDepartment of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Minoru KitagoDepartment of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahiro JinzakiDepartment of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Michiie SakamotoDepartment of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI JP21K15390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo achieve a historical perspective, the chronological changes in primary liver cancer over a 20-year period were investigated at a single institution, focusing on shifts in etiology and the impact on imaging and pathological findings using The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective study of surgically resected primary liver cancer in 680 patients from 2001 to 2020 resulted in 434 patients with 482 nodules being analyzed. Dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography imaging and the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System 2018 classification were employed. Two pathologists and two radiologists independently evaluated specimens and images.

resultsThis study highlighted a significant decline in cases of viral hepatitis and cirrhosis in primary liver cancer patients but an increase in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and scirrhous hepatocellular carcinoma. Notably, there was a rise in non-viral hepatitis cases, potentially pointing toward an increase in steatohepatitic hepatocellular carcinoma cases in the future. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, scirrhous hepatocellular carcinoma and steatohepatitic hepatocellular carcinoma tumors exhibited slightly different distributions in the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System classification compared with ordinary hepatocellular carcinoma, which may reflect the presence of fibrosis and lipid in tumor parenchyma.

conclusionsConsistent with past reports, this study demonstrated the emergence of primary liver cancer against a backdrop of non-viral and non-cirrhotic liver. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System has been consistently useful in diagnosing primary liver cancer; however, among the histological subtypes of hepatocellular carcinoma, an increase is anticipated in scirrhous hepatocellular carcinoma and steatohepatitic hepatocellular carcinoma, which may present imaging findings different from those of ordinary hepatocellular carcinoma. This development may necessitate a reevaluation of the current approach for diagnosing and treating hepatocellular carcinoma based solely on imaging.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCholangiocarcinomaFemaleHumansLiver CirrhosisMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray Computedcomputed tomographyhepatocellular carcinomaintrahepatic cholangiocarcinomaprimary liver cancersubtype

Identifiers

PMID39775861
PMCPMC11973632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.