ArticleGigaScience2025
Mutation impact on mRNA versus protein expression across human cancers.
Article in GigaScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rewriting the cancer proteome: targeting selective translation as a therapeutic frontier.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
- H3.3G34W immunohistochemistry negative giant cell tumour of bone. Extended analysis of 35 such cases from a single institution in India.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Genomic profiling enables personalized strategies to overcome drug resistance in multiple myeloma.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Explainable AI Model Reveals Informative Mutational Signatures for Cancer-Type Classification.Cancers · 2025Article
- Landscape of TET2 Mutations: From Hematological Malignancies to Solid Tumors.Cancer medicine · 2025Review
- Molecular and Functional Analysis of TLR 1, 2 and 6 in Peripheral Blood Monocytes of Patients with Schizophrenia: A Pilot Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Mutation impact on mRNA versus protein expression across human cancers.GigaScience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCancer mutations are often assumed to alter proteins, thus promoting tumorigenesis. However, how mutations affect protein expression-in addition to gene expression-has rarely been systematically investigated. This is significant as mRNA and protein levels frequently show only moderate correlation, driven by factors such as translation efficiency and protein degradation. Proteogenomic datasets from large tumor cohorts provide an opportunity to systematically analyze the effects of somatic mutations on mRNA and protein abundance and identify mutations with distinct impacts on these molecular levels.
resultsWe conduct a comprehensive analysis of mutation impacts on mRNA- and protein-level expressions of 953 cancer cases with paired genomics and global proteomic profiling across 6 cancer types. Protein-level impacts are validated for 47.2% of the somatic expression quantitative trait loci (seQTLs), including CDH1 and MSH3 truncations, as well as other mutations from likely "long-tail" driver genes. Devising a statistical pipeline for identifying somatic protein-specific QTLs (spsQTLs), we reveal several gene mutations, including NF1 and MAP2K4 truncations and TP53 missenses showing disproportional influence on protein abundance not readily explained by transcriptomics. Cross-validating with data from massively parallel assays of variant effects (MAVE), TP53 missenses associated with high tumor TP53 proteins are more likely to be experimentally confirmed as functional.
conclusionThis study reveals that somatic mutations can exhibit distinct impacts on mRNA and protein levels, underscoring the necessity of integrating proteogenomic data to comprehensively identify functionally significant cancer mutations. These insights provide a framework for prioritizing mutations for further functional validation and therapeutic targeting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.