Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39775798›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025

The Associations Between Myopia and Fundus Tessellation in School Children: A Comparative Analysis of Macular and Peripapillary Regions Using Deep Learning.

Dan Huang, Xiao Lin, Hui Zhu, Saiguang Ling, Zhou Dong, Xin Ke, Tengfei Long, Yingxiao Qian, Qi Yan, Rui Li and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Dan HuangDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xiao LinTongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Hui ZhuDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Saiguang LingEVision technology (Beijing) Co. LTD, Beijing, China.
Zhou DongEVision technology (Beijing) Co. LTD, Beijing, China.
Xin KeEVision technology (Beijing) Co. LTD, Beijing, China.
Tengfei LongAerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing, China.
Yingxiao QianJiangsu Union Technical institute, Changzhou, China.
Qi YanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu, China.
Rui LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Hua ZhongDepartment of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Hu LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the refractive differences among school-aged children with macular or peripapillary fundus tessellation (FT) distribution patterns, using fundus tessellation density (FTD) quantified by deep learning (DL) technology. Methods: The cross-sectional study included 1942 school children aged six to 15 years, undergoing ocular biometric parameters, cycloplegic refraction, and fundus photography. FTD was quantified for both the macular (6 mm) and peripapillary (4 mm) regions, using DL-based image processing applied to 45° color fundus photographs. Eyes exhibiting tessellation were classified into two groups: the macular distribution group had greater FTD in the macular area, while the peripapillary distribution group had higher FTD in the peripapillary area, allowing for a comparative analysis of axial length (AL), corneal radius, and refraction. Results: Participants had a median age of 13 years and a median spherical equivalent (SE) of -0.75 D. The macular distribution group exhibited significantly larger AL (24.13 mm vs. 23.93 mm, P < 0.001) and more myopic refraction (-1.13 D vs. -0.75 D, P < 0.001) compared to the peripapillary group. A higher prevalence of macular-distributed FT was noted in the myopic groups (χ2 = 131.675, P < 0.001). SE negatively correlated with macular (r = -0.238) and peripapillary FTD (r = -0.195), while AL positively correlated with FTD in both regions (r = 0.308; r = 0.265) (all P < 0.001). Conclusions: The macular FT distribution pattern is significantly associated with larger AL and greater myopic refraction in school-aged children, suggesting its potential as a marker for identifying children at risk of progressing myopia. Translational Relevance: DL analysis precisely identifies FT distribution patterns, potentially enhancing early detection of high-risk myopia in populations.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMacula LuteaMyopiaRefraction, OcularAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFundus OculiHumansMaleOptic Disk

Identifiers

PMID39775798
PMCPMC11721481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.