ArticleDento maxillo facial radiology2025
Machine learning for automated identification of anatomical landmarks in ultrasound periodontal imaging.
Article in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasound-based assessment of peri-implant mucosal thickness: an ex vivo comparative study with artificial intelligence-assisted image analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Quantification of Supracrestal Tissue Attachment Using High-Frequency Ultrasound.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2026Article
- High frequency miniaturized transducer for facial and lingual full-mouth human imaging including third molars.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Performance Evaluation of a Miniaturized, Toothbrush-Shaped Ultrasound Transducer for Periodontal Imaging.ACS sensors · 2025Article
- In vivo periodontal ultrasound imaging via a hockey-stick transducer and comparison to periodontal probing: a proof-of-concept study.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo identify landmarks in ultrasound periodontal images and automate the image-based measurements of gingival recession (iGR), gingival height (iGH), and alveolar bone level (iABL) using machine learning.
methodsWe imaged 184 teeth from 29 human subjects. The dataset included 1580 frames for training and validating the U-Net convolutional neural network machine learning model, and 250 frames from new teeth that were not used in training for testing the generalization performance. The predicted landmarks, including the tooth, gingiva, bone, gingival margin (GM), cementoenamel junction (CEJ), and alveolar bone crest (ABC), were compared to manual annotations. We further demonstrated automated measurements of the clinical metrics iGR, iGH, and iABL.
resultsOver 98% of predicted GM, CEJ, and ABC distances are within 200 µm of the manual annotation. Bland-Altman analysis revealed biases (bias of machine learning vs ground truth) of -0.1 µm, -37.6 µm, and -40.9 µm, with 95% limits of agreement of [-281.3, 281.0] µm, [-203.1, 127.9] µm, and [-297.6, 215.8] µm for iGR, iGH, and iABL, respectively, when compared to manual annotations. On the test dataset, the biases were 167.5 µm, 40.1 µm, and 78.7 µm with 95% CIs of [-1175 to 1510] µm, [-910.3 to 990.4] µm, and [-1954 to 1796] µm for iGR, iGH, and iABL, respectively.
conclusionsThe proposed machine learning model demonstrates robust prediction performance, with the potential to enhance the efficiency of clinical periodontal diagnosis by automating landmark identification and clinical metrics measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.