SynthesisCadernos de saude publica2024
Perceptions about children and adolescents' mental health crisis intervention: a qualitative systematic review.
Synthesis in Cadernos de saude publica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Experiences of restrictive practices in child and adolescent mental health inpatient care: an integrative review.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review aimed to identify and synthesize the perceptions of mental healthcare professionals, family members, and users about mental health crisis interventions for children and adolescents at hospitals and community mental health services. A qualitative systematic review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institution guidelines. The search was performed in 15 databases, with no temporal delimitation, and included studies in Portuguese, English, and Spanish. All works were assessed regarding methodological quality, credibility, and dependability according to the ConQual score and the recommendations were assessed following the Joanna Briggs Institution guidelines. In total, two independent reviewers screened and assessed the studies, extracted their data, developed categories, and conducted the thematic synthesis. A total of 13 studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. From these, five syntheses were developed: importance of relationships; importance of procedures during treatment; positive emotional responses to treatment; negative emotional responses to treatment; and issues with health professionals and health services. All five syntheses presented high dependability; two syntheses presented high credibility; and three presented moderate credibility. Mental healthcare professionals, family members and users had convergent perceptions about crisis intervention provided at healthcare services. Understanding their perceptions to improve care and the user experience in this vulnerable situation is crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.