Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39775767›Full record

ArticleCadernos de saude publica2024

Early warning system using primary health care data in the post-COVID-19 pandemic era: Brazil nationwide case-study.

Thiago Cerqueira-Silva, Juliane F Oliveira, Vinicius de Araújo Oliveira, Pilar Tavares Veras Florentino, Alberto Sironi, Gerson O Penna, Pablo Ivan Pereira Ramos, Viviane S Boaventura, Manoel Barral-Netto, Izabel Marcilio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Thiago Cerqueira-SilvaInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-4534-2509
Juliane F OliveiraInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-7167-8754
Vinicius de Araújo OliveiraInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-7858-9650
Pilar Tavares Veras FlorentinoInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-8077-8100
Alberto SironiInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-8964-0260
Gerson O PennaCentro de Medicina Tropical, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-8967-536X
Pablo Ivan Pereira RamosInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-9075-7861
Viviane S BoaventuraInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-7241-6844
Manoel Barral-NettoInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-5823-7903
Izabel MarcilioInstituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-2914-6535

Funding

Research Support, Non-US Gov’t
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Syndromic surveillance using primary health care (PHC) data is a valuable tool for early outbreak detection, as demonstrated by the potential to identify COVID-19 outbreaks. However, the potential of such an early warning system in the post-COVID-19 era remains largely unexplored. We analyzed PHC encounter counter of respiratory complaints registered in the database of the Brazilian Unified National Health System from October 2022 to July 2023. We applied EARS (variations C1/C2/C3) and EVI to estimate the weekly thresholds. An alarm was determined when the number of encounters exceeded the week-specific threshold. We used data on hospitalization due to respiratory disease to classify as anomalies the weeks in which the number of cases surpassed predetermined thresholds. We compared EARS and EVI efficacy in anticipating anomalies. A total of 119 anomalies were identified across 116 immediate regions during the study period. The EARS-C2 presented the highest early alarm rate, with 81/119 (68%) early alarms, and C1 the lowest, with 71 (60%) early alarms. The lowest true positivity was the EARS-C1 118/1,354 (8.7%) and the highest was EARS-C3 99/856 (11.6%). Routinely collected PHC data can be successfully used to detect respiratory disease outbreaks in Brazil. Syndromic surveillance enhances timeliness in surveillance strategies, albeit with lower specificity. A combined approach with other strategies is essential to strengthen accuracy, offering a proactive and effective public health response against future outbreaks.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsPrimary Health CareBrazilHumansSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID39775767
PMCPMC11654108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.