Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39775670›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2025

Distribution of Geriatric 8 screening tool scores in elderly and non-elderly patients with cancer.

Hideki Shimaoka, Yoichiro Yoshida, Teppei Yamada, Hisaaki Shimokoube, Naoya Aisu, Shinichiro Ogawa, Kazuo Tamura, Suguru Hasegawa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prognostic value of nutritional and functional screening instruments for mortality in patients with hematologic malignancies.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Observational
  2. Observational
  3. Association between geriatric 8 (G8) scores and self-care decline in elderly patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma undergoing radiotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hideki ShimaokaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fukuoka University Faculty of Medicine, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-Ku, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
Yoichiro YoshidaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fukuoka University Faculty of Medicine, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-Ku, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan. yyoshida@fukuoka-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6583-7352
Teppei YamadaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fukuoka University Faculty of Medicine, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-Ku, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
Hisaaki ShimokoubeDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fukuoka University Faculty of Medicine, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-Ku, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
Naoya AisuDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fukuoka University Faculty of Medicine, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-Ku, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
Shinichiro OgawaDepartment of Medical Informatics and Digital Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-Ku, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
Kazuo TamuraFukuoka University, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-Ku, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
Suguru HasegawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fukuoka University Faculty of Medicine, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-Ku, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.

Funding

Fukuoka University GR2315Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Center, Health Research Institute, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences 21445722
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPopulation aging and increased cancer incidence have made the treatment of cancer in older individuals an increasingly important issue. Geriatric 8 (G8) is a screening tool developed to identify patients who would benefit most from a comprehensive geriatric assessment (GA). Previous G8 studies have involved older patients, but the age-related significance and usefulness of G8 is unknown. In this study, G8 screening was administered to patients who were 30 years of age or over with cancer to examine a G8 score in each 10 years age group and its correlation with other GA tools. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study was conducted at Fukuoka University Hospital from January 2020 to March 2022 and enrolled 715 patients aged ≥ 30 years undergoing surgery for primary gastrointestinal cancer or malignant disease. The relationship between age, G8, instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), activities of daily living (ADL), and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was investigated.

resultsThe median age of the patients was 69 years (34-98 years). Functional disability in ADLs was present in 43 patients (6%) and in IADLs in 72 patients (10.1%). The mean G8 score by age group was 13.7, 13.1, 13.3, 13.3, 12.4, 11.3, and 9.25 for ages 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, 80-89, and 90-100 years, respectively. For each of the ADL/IADL items, the group with functional disability had significantly lower G8 scores than the group without functional disability (p < 0.001). The relationship between the G8 score and CCI by age group showed that the G8 score decreased as the CCI score increased. Assessments divided into age groups of 65, 70, and 75 years showed significant differences between groups for most ADL/IADL items and G8 scores, even when divided by age 65. DISCUSSION: G8 scores were lower in patients with ADL/IADL disabilities and decreased with age in both the presence and absence of disabilities. The G8 total score decreased significantly after the age of 70 years. Performing G8 in patients < 65 years of age does not decrease sensitivity; however, the functional decline is so slight that it appears reasonable to restrict G8 screening to patients ≥ 65 years of age.

Indexed as

Geriatric AssessmentNeoplasmsActivities of Daily LivingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedCancerG8Geriatric assessmentSurgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.