ArticleAdvances in therapy2025
US Real-World Effectiveness, Tolerability, and Healthcare Resource Utilization After Addition of Fremanezumab for Preventive Treatment in Patients Using Gepants for Acute Treatment of Migraine: Results From a Retrospective Chart Review.
Article in Advances in therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionFremanezumab, a monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway, and gepants, small molecule CGRP receptor antagonists, are both approved for the treatment of migraine or its symptoms. This study assessed effectiveness, tolerability, and migraine-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) after the addition of fremanezumab for preventive migraine treatment in patients using gepants for acute treatment.
methodsData were extracted during a retrospective chart review from electronic medical records from the Dent Neurologic Institute. Eligible patients were ≥ 18 years old, using gepants (rimegepant or ubrogepant), who initiated fremanezumab between January 1, 2020, and May 1, 2021 (index date: date of fremanezumab initiation) and continued concomitant use of gepants and fremanezumab for ≥ 1 month (post-index; between 7-9 months of follow-up). Outcomes included monthly migraine days (MMD), adverse events (AEs), reasons for discontinuation, and migraine-related HCRU.
resultsA total of 55 patients [female, 93%; mean (SD) age, 43.5 (13.5) years] met the inclusion criteria. All patients were diagnosed with chronic migraine. Patients had an average (SD) MMD of 15.8 (7.4) at the index date. Average (SE) change in MMD from index date to post-index was - 6.5 (1.0) days (p < 0.0001). Five patients (9.1%) experienced AEs post-index; no serious AEs (SAEs) were reported. The number of migraine-related medications used decreased from the index date to post-index by a mean of 0.6 for preventive medications (p = 0.070), and 0.8 for acute medications (p = 0.050). The number of outpatient office-based visits also decreased [mean (SD): 6 months pre-index, 5.8 (4.4) vs. 6 months post-index, 4.1 (4.0); p < 0.0001].
conclusionThe addition of fremanezumab preventively to gepants for acute migraine treatment was effective, resulted in fewer outpatient office visits, and yielded no SAEs or AEs that were novel to these migraine medication classes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.