Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39775553›Full record

ReviewAnalytical methods : advancing methods and applications2025

Advances in human papillomavirus detection for cervical cancer screening and diagnosis: challenges of conventional methods and opportunities for emergent tools.

O Fashedemi, Okoroike C Ozoemena, Siwaphiwe Peteni, Aderemi B Haruna, Leshweni J Shai, Aicheng Chen, Frankie Rawson, Maggie E Cruickshank, David Grant, Oluwafunmilola Ola and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. A Field-Deployable RotEx-LAMP-LFA Platform for Molecular Triage of HPV-Driven Oncogenesis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  9. Human Papillomavirus: An Old New History.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

O FashedemiAdvanced Materials Group, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK. oluwafunmilola.ola@nottingham.ac.uk.
Okoroike C OzoemenaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5541-6973
Siwaphiwe PeteniMolecular Science Institute, School of Chemistry, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa. kenneth.ozoemena@wits.ac.za.
Aderemi B HarunaMolecular Science Institute, School of Chemistry, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa. kenneth.ozoemena@wits.ac.za.
Leshweni J ShaiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-4799-7437
Aicheng ChenDepartment of Chemistry, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2239-6785
Frankie RawsonAdvanced Materials Group, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK. oluwafunmilola.ola@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4872-8928
Maggie E CruickshankAberdeen Centre for Women's Health Research, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK.
David GrantAdvanced Materials Group, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK. oluwafunmilola.ola@nottingham.ac.uk.
Oluwafunmilola OlaAdvanced Materials Group, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK. oluwafunmilola.ola@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3060-8044
Kenneth I OzoemenaMolecular Science Institute, School of Chemistry, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa. kenneth.ozoemena@wits.ac.za.ORCID 0000-0001-7107-7003

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the main cause of cervical cancer and other cancers such as anogenital and oropharyngeal cancers. The prevention screening and treatment of cervical cancer has remained one of the top priorities of the World Health Organization (WHO). In 2020, the WHO came up with the 90-70-90 strategy aimed at eliminating cervical cancers as a public health problem by the year 2030. One of the key priorities of this strategy is the recommendation for countries to ensure that 70% of their women are screened using a high-performance test by the age of 35, and again by the age of 45. Over the years, several traditional methods (notably, Pap smear and nucleic acid-based techniques) have been used for the detection of cervical cancer. While these methods have significantly reduced the incidence of cervical cancer and death, they still come short of excellence for the total eradication of HPV infection. The challenges include low sensitivity, low specificity, poor reproducibility, the need for high-level specialists, and the high cost of access to the facilities, to mention a few. Interestingly, however, several efforts are being made today to mitigate these challenges. In this review, we discussed the pros and cons of the traditional screening and testing of HPV infections, the efforts being made to improve their performances, and the emergent tools (especially, the electrochemical methods) that promise to revolutionize the screening and testing of HPV infections. The main aim of the review is to provide some novel clues to researchers that would allow for the development of high-performance, affordable, and triage-suitable electrochemical-based diagnostic tools for HPV and cervical cancer.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHuman Papillomavirus VirusesHumans

Identifiers

PMID39775553
PMCPMC11706323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.