ArticleJournal of nephrology2025
Association between urate-lowering therapy and kidney failure in patients with chronic kidney disease.
Article in Journal of nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hyperpolypharmacy in patients with chronic kidney disease and its impact on clinical outcomes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHyperuricemia is a hallmark of gout and a suspected risk factor for the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, the impact of urate-lowering therapy on CKD progression is subject to debate. The objective of the present study was to describe the prevalence of inappropriate urate-lowering therapy prescriptions and evaluate the association between urate-lowering therapy prescription and the progression of kidney disease in patients with CKD.
methodsCKD-REIN is a French, nationwide, prospective cohort of 3,033 nephrology outpatients with CKD (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m
resultsAt baseline, 987 of the 3009 patients included in this study (median age: 69; men: 66%) were receiving urate-lowering therapy; 396 of these 987 patients were receiving an inappropriate prescription with regard to their kidney function. During a 5-year follow-up period, 70% of the 396 urate-lowering therapy prescriptions remained inappropriate. In the propensity score-matched cohort (n = 674), 136 patients started KRT. Compared with non- urate-lowering therapy use, urate-lowering therapy use was not significantly associated with a slowing in CKD progression, regardless of the definition used (HR
conclusionsOur real-world data emphasized the lack of reassessment of urate-lowering therapy prescriptions in patients with CKD. Urate-lowering therapy was not associated with a slowing of CKD progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39775518What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.